These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26013154)

  • 21. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H
    Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography.
    Franken M; Grimm B; Heyligers I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 20044692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital templating in hip replacement with and without radiological markers.
    Heinert G; Hendricks J; Loeffler MD
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 19336804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of acetate and digital templating for hip resurfacing.
    Bracey DN; Seyler TM; Shields JS; Leng X; Jinnah RH; Lang JE
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Jan; 43(1):E19-24. PubMed ID: 24490189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiographic Calibration With a Prosthetic Femoral Head Allows Accurate Preoperative Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Pachter CS; Garfinkel JH; Romness DW; Gladnick BP
    Orthopedics; 2019 May; 42(3):e346-e349. PubMed ID: 30913298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty.
    Bono JV
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004; 86-A Suppl 2():118-22. PubMed ID: 15691116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fixation of the cemented acetabular component in hip arthroplasty.
    Flivik G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Apr; 76(316):3-30. PubMed ID: 16042372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty.
    Argenson JN; Flecher X; Parratte S; Aubaniac JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():40-5. PubMed ID: 17906591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Common errors in the execution of preoperative templating for primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Tripuraneni KR; Archibeck MJ; Junick DW; Carothers JT; White RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 20022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Size of cup affects the anterior capsular distance in total hip arthroplasty, as measured with ultrasound.
    Tarasevicius S; Loiba V; Stucinskas J; Robertsson O; Wingstrand H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jan; 15():23. PubMed ID: 24438074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 12-year in vivo comparative wear study.
    Karidakis GK; Karachalios T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3836-45. PubMed ID: 26290343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A biomechanical comparison of the thrust plate prosthesis and a stemmed prosthesis.
    Karatosun V; Unver B; Gultekin A; Gunal I
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 21960448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scaling digital radiographs for templating in total hip arthroplasty using conventional acetate templates independent of calibration markers.
    Brew CJ; Simpson PM; Whitehouse SL; Donnelly W; Crawford RW; Hubble MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 21978566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of a digital image processing software package for the in vivo measurement of wear in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties.
    Kennard E; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 May; 28(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 16122967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CORR Insights(®): There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2042-4. PubMed ID: 25613407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral offset.
    Sariali E; Mouttet A; Pasquier G; Durante E
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):990-7. PubMed ID: 18757175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of an anatomical acetabular component for treatment of iliopsoas impingement.
    O'Connor MI
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e13-5. PubMed ID: 21296552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The peritrochanteric space of the hip.
    Voos JE; Ranawat AS; Kelly BT
    Instr Course Lect; 2009; 58():193-201. PubMed ID: 19385533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.