These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26013773)

  • 1. The Impact of Waiting Time on Health Gains from Surgery: Evidence from a National Patient-reported Outcome Dataset.
    Nikolova S; Harrison M; Sutton M
    Health Econ; 2016 Aug; 25(8):955-68. PubMed ID: 26013773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waiting time prioritisation: Evidence from England.
    Gutacker N; Siciliani L; Cookson R
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jun; 159():140-51. PubMed ID: 27183130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty.
    Fyie K; Frank C; Noseworthy T; Christiansen T; Marshall DA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 24004242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equity, waiting times, and NHS reforms: retrospective study.
    Cooper ZN; McGuire A; Jones S; Le Grand J
    BMJ; 2009 Sep; 339():b3264. PubMed ID: 19729415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact on hospital performance of introducing routine patient reported outcome measures in surgery.
    Varagunam M; Hutchings A; Neuburger J; Black N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2014 Apr; 19(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 24072815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Snakes and ladders: the barriers and facilitators of elective hip- and knee-replacement surgery in Australian public hospitals.
    Walters JL; Mackintosh SF; Sheppard L
    Aust Health Rev; 2013 May; 37(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 23497804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation.
    Damani Z; Bohm E; Quan H; Noseworthy T; MacKean G; Loucks L; Marshall DA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e028373. PubMed ID: 31874866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waiting times and patient perspectives for total hip and knee arthroplasty in rural and urban Ontario.
    Snider MG; MacDonald SJ; Pototschnik R
    Can J Surg; 2005 Oct; 48(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 16248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of waiting times on demand and supply for elective surgery: Evidence from Italy.
    Riganti A; Siciliani L; Fiorio CV
    Health Econ; 2017 Sep; 26 Suppl 2():92-105. PubMed ID: 28940920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of the 6-month waiting target for elective surgery: a patient record study.
    Blackett J; Carslaw A; Lees D; Fargher S; Rao S; Pohl M
    N Z Med J; 2014 Nov; 127(1405):45-53. PubMed ID: 25399041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early recovery following lower limb arthroplasty: Qualitative interviews with patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgery. Initial phase in the development of a patient-reported outcome measure.
    Strickland LH; Kelly L; Hamilton TW; Murray DW; Pandit HG; Jenkinson C
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jul; 27(13-14):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 28960546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unmet needs and waiting list prioritization for knee arthroplasty.
    Comas M; Román R; Quintana JM; Castells X;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):789-97. PubMed ID: 19911242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a prospective cohort study.
    Grassi A; Golinelli D; Tedesco D; Rolli M; Bordini B; Amabile M; Rucci P; Fantini MP; Zaffagnini S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):374. PubMed ID: 31416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of patient expectations as a determinant of satisfaction with waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery.
    Conner-Spady BL; Sanmartin C; Johnston GH; McGurran JJ; Kehler M; Noseworthy TW
    Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 21680042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between patient-reported outcomes of elective surgery and hospital and consultant volume.
    Varagunam M; Hutchings A; Black N
    Med Care; 2015 Apr; 53(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 25654295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Payer Type on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Modulated by Baseline Patient Characteristics.
    Halawi MJ; Cote MP; Savoy L; Williams VJ; Lieberman JR
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1072-1075. PubMed ID: 30797645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How effective is our current Orthopaedic Prioritisation Tool for scoring patients for arthroplasty surgery?
    Singleton N; Agius L; Rao S
    N Z Med J; 2016 Sep; 129(1442):52-9. PubMed ID: 27657159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables.
    Judge A; Welton NJ; Sandhu J; Ben-Shlomo Y
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 19542267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access to surgery.
    Rathnayake D; Clarke M; Jayasinghe V
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256578. PubMed ID: 34460854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Streamlining elective surgery care in a public hospital: the Alfred experience.
    Lowthian JA; Curtis AJ; Comitti BL; Cameron PA; Keogh MJ; Johnson WR; Tomlinson J; Stripp AM
    Med J Aust; 2011 May; 194(9):448-51. PubMed ID: 21534899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.