These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26015720)

  • 1. Bupivacaine versus lignocaine as the choice of locall anesthetic agent for impacted third molar surgery a review.
    Balakrishnan K; Ebenezer V; Dakir A; Kumar S; Prakash D
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Apr; 7(Suppl 1):S230-3. PubMed ID: 26015720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is amalgamated ligno-bupivacaine an answer to complicated minor oral surgical anesthesia? A randomized split-mouth double-blind clinical trial.
    Mishra A; Mahajan M; Bande C; Joshi A; Gawande M; Gupta MK
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 29362928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Goyal R; Sharma P; Bali R
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Jun; 20(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 33927491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study.
    Jain NK; John RR
    Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 27212774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of efficacy of lignocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in pain control during extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.
    Nazeer J; Kumari S; Haidry N; Kulkarni P; Aastha ; Gautam A; Gupta P
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2021; 12(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 34483583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bupivacaine vs. lidocaine: a comparison of local anesthetic efficacy in impacted third molar surgery.
    Velioglu O; Calis AS; Koca H; Velioglu E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3539-3546. PubMed ID: 32065309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Ketamine as an Adjunct to Local Anesthesia in the Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars - A Split Mouth Prospective Controlled Clinical Study.
    Shah A; Halli R; Merchant Y; Kshirsagar R; Khurana J
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Oct; 10(10):ZC29-ZC33. PubMed ID: 27891453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after the surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline.
    Rood JP; Coulthard P; Snowdon AT; Gennery BA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 40(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 12464207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical comparative study of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 2% plain lignocaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline as local anesthetic agents for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Nalawade SH; Nilesh K; Kumar CDM; Punde PA; Patil PB
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2021; 12(2):255-261. PubMed ID: 34483586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative pain after bupivacaine supplementation in mandibular third molar surgery: splint-mouth randomized double blind controlled clinical trial.
    de Souza AM; Horliana AC; Simone JL; Jorge WA; Tortamano IP
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 25338961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Buprenorphine with bupivacaine for intraoral nerve blocks to provide postoperative analgesia in outpatients after minor oral surgery.
    Modi M; Rastogi S; Kumar A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2571-6. PubMed ID: 19925973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of ondansetron as an adjunct to lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia on tourniquet pain and postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective hand surgery: a systematic review protocol.
    Badeaux J; Bonanno L; Au H
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 26447005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.
    Shyamala M; Ramesh C; Yuvaraj V; Suresh V; SathyaNarayanan R; Balaji TS; Neil Dominic M; Nithin Joseph Jude B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Mar; 15(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 26929560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
    Gregorio LV; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Modena KC; Colombini BL; Calvo AM; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Trindade Junior AS; Santos CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparative Study between the Effect of Combined Local Anesthetic and Low-dose Ketamine with Local Anesthetic on Postoperative Complications after Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
    Kumar A; Kale TP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 16(12):957-62. PubMed ID: 27018030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine.
    Trullenque-Eriksson A; Guisado-Moya B
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May; 16(3):e390-6. PubMed ID: 21196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Intra-Socket Bupivacaine Administration Versus Oral Mefenamic Acid Capsule for Postoperative Pain Management Following Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Talimkhani I; Jamalpour MR; Babaei H; Faradmal J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 77(7):1365-1370. PubMed ID: 30790529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.
    Beena S; Bhargava D; Gurjar P; Shrivastava S; Dalsingh V; Koneru G
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 31336212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia.
    Dhanrajani P; Chung P
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2016 Jun; 16(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 28879304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.