These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2601605)

  • 1. [Mechanical study on the stability of multiform mini-plates. I. Double-T-type plate (90, regular, 6-holes) in mandibular body fracture].
    Kameyama T; Sakamoto E; Takeshima H; Shimada J; Yamamoto Y
    Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1989; 18(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 2601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dynamic study of miniplates by finite element method].
    Sakai T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1989 Mar; 89(3):511-59. PubMed ID: 2626689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
    Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
    Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study].
    Liang JY; Li KH; Liao QD; Zhu Y; Hu YH; Lei GH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of three osteosynthesis devices used for stabilizing condylar fractures of the mandible.
    Meyer C; Serhir L; Boutemi P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 34(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 16537107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biomechanic study on length of plate in treatment of tibial shaft fracture].
    Hu X; Yang S; Xiao D; Lin B; Wang H; Xu Z; Zhao W; Zhang M
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 22(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and biomechanical testing of a new osteosynthesis plate (TCP) designed to stabilize mandibular condyle fractures.
    Meyer C; Martin E; Kahn JL; Zink S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 35(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 17448669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of the mechanical resistance of 2 separate plates and 2 overlaid plates used in the fixation of the mandibular condyle: an in vitro study.
    Gealh WC; Costa JV; Ferreira GM; Iwaki Filho L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 19304028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
    Wang H; Chen MS; Fan YB; Tang W; Tian WD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mechanical study on the stability of the titanium mini plate in monocortical osteosynthesis].
    Takeshima H; Sakamoto E; Shimada J; Hiranuma Y; Kameyama T; Kougo A; Katoh K; Yamamoto Y; Sumida H
    Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1988; 17(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 3271930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fixation properties of a biodegradable "free-form" osteosynthesis plate.
    Väänänen P; Nurmi JT; Nuutinen JP; Jakonen S; Happonen H; Jank S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 18554937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures.
    Madsen MJ; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 16487809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of compressive strength between three different plates for mandibular angle fractures fixation.
    Negreiros Lyrio MC; Monnazzi MS; De Moraes M; Hochuli-Vieira E; Nunes Reis JM; Pereira-Filho VA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e277-80. PubMed ID: 24296119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
    Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Lovald ST; Wagner JD; Baack B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):973-85. PubMed ID: 19375006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biomechanical comparison of two volar locked plates in a dorsally unstable distal radius fracture model.
    Liporace FA; Kubiak EN; Jeong GK; Iesaka K; Egol KA; Koval KJ
    J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):668-72. PubMed ID: 16967005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.