BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26016777)

  • 1. SeqGL Identifies Context-Dependent Binding Signals in Genome-Wide Regulatory Element Maps.
    Setty M; Leslie CS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004271. PubMed ID: 26016777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GERV: a statistical method for generative evaluation of regulatory variants for transcription factor binding.
    Zeng H; Hashimoto T; Kang DD; Gifford DK
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 26476779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
    Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. XL-DNase-seq: improved footprinting of dynamic transcription factors.
    Oh KS; Ha J; Baek S; Sung MH
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2019 Jun; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 31164146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of Predictive Cis-Regulatory Elements Using a Discriminative Objective Function and a Dynamic Search Space.
    Karnik R; Beer MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140557. PubMed ID: 26465884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motif discovery and transcription factor binding sites before and after the next-generation sequencing era.
    Zambelli F; Pesole G; Pavesi G
    Brief Bioinform; 2013 Mar; 14(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 22517426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discovery of directional and nondirectional pioneer transcription factors by modeling DNase profile magnitude and shape.
    Sherwood RI; Hashimoto T; O'Donnell CW; Lewis S; Barkal AA; van Hoff JP; Karun V; Jaakkola T; Gifford DK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 32(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 24441470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RSAT::Plants: Motif Discovery in ChIP-Seq Peaks of Plant Genomes.
    Castro-Mondragon JA; Rioualen C; Contreras-Moreira B; van Helden J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1482():297-322. PubMed ID: 27557775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of C2H2-ZF binding preferences from ChIP-seq data using RCADE.
    Najafabadi HS; Albu M; Hughes TR
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2879-81. PubMed ID: 25953800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
    Eggeling R; Roos T; Myllymäki P; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():375. PubMed ID: 26552868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.