These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26017488)

  • 1. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A radiological method to evaluate alveolar bone regeneration in the Chacma baboon (Papio ursinus).
    Kotze MJ; Bütow KW; Kotze HF
    SADJ; 2012 Jun; 67(5):210-4. PubMed ID: 23185946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pixel value analysis for detection of simulated early external root resorption.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Paiz CC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Capelozza AL
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25229785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic exposure compensation in intraoral digital radiography: effect on the gray values of dental tissues.
    Maciel ERC; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Pontual MLDA; Pontual ADA; Ramos-Perez FMM
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Jan; 22(1):4. PubMed ID: 34983424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative subtraction with direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Sep; 26(5):286-94. PubMed ID: 9482001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.
    Sanden E; Koob A; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 12967070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 16360848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 11373732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
    Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.