125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26017545)
1. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicability of the polynomial chaos expansion method for personalization of a cardiovascular pulse wave propagation model.
Huberts W; Donders WP; Delhaas T; van de Vosse FN
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1679-704. PubMed ID: 25377937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics.
Schäfer F; Schiavazzi DE; Hellevik LR; Sturdy J
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; ():e3836. PubMed ID: 38837871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.
Melis A; Clayton RH; Marzo A
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 33(12):. PubMed ID: 28337862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of approximation techniques for variance-based sensitivity analysis of biochemical reaction systems.
Zhang HX; Goutsias J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():246. PubMed ID: 20462443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncertainty quantification for ecological models with random parameters.
Reimer JR; Adler FR; Golden KM; Narayan A
Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2232-2244. PubMed ID: 36068942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global Reliability Sensitivity Analysis Based on Maximum Entropy and 2-Layer Polynomial Chaos Expansion.
Zhao J; Zeng S; Guo J; Du S
Entropy (Basel); 2018 Mar; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 33265293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for patient level simulation models: efficient estimation of mean and variance using ANOVA.
O'Hagan A; Stevenson M; Madan J
Health Econ; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1009-23. PubMed ID: 17173339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying the stochastic Galerkin method to epidemic models with uncertainty in the parameters.
Harman DB; Johnston PR
Math Biosci; 2016 Jul; 277():25-37. PubMed ID: 27091743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variance-based sensitivity analysis of biological uncertainties in carbon ion therapy.
Kamp F; Brüningk S; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ
Phys Med; 2014 Jul; 30(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 24870245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing global sensitivity analysis for a biofilm model for two-step nitrification using the qualitative screening method of Morris or the quantitative variance-based Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST).
Brockmann D; Morgenroth E
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):85-93. PubMed ID: 17978436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis of queueing models based on polynomial chaos approach.
Ameur L; Bachioua L
Arab J Math; 2021; 10(3):527-542. PubMed ID: 34796091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalized polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and propagation in multi-scale modeling of cardiac electrophysiology.
Hu Z; Du D; Du Y
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():57-74. PubMed ID: 30248513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polynomial chaos expansion based sensitivity analysis of predicted knee reactions-assessing the influence of the primary ligaments in distraction based models.
Hafez MA; Halloran JP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023; 26(14):1678-1690. PubMed ID: 36222456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Metamodeling Approach for Instant Severity Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification of Iliac Artery Stenoses.
Heinen SGH; Gashi K; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31513713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
