BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26017594)

  • 1. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms.
    Ingargiola MJ; Motakef S; Chung MT; Vasconez HC; Sasaki GH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):1581-1590. PubMed ID: 26017594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryolipolysis: A promising nonsurgical technique for localized fat reduction.
    Kania B; Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 37988716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryolipolysis in the United States-Review of the clinical data.
    Hetzel J; Awad N; Bhupalam V; Nestor M
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():8-14. PubMed ID: 37988714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive selective cryolipolysis and reperfusion recovery for localized natural fat reduction and contouring.
    Sasaki GH; Abelev N; Tevez-Ortiz A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Mar; 34(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 24598865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective Study Determining Patient Satisfaction with Combined Cryolipolysis and Shockwave Therapy Treatment for Noninvasive Body Contouring.
    Michon A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2317-2325. PubMed ID: 33515083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.
    Coiante E; Pensato R; Hadji I; Lo Giudice G; Pizza C; SidAhmed-Mezi M; D'Andrea F; Meningaud JP; Hersant B; La Padula S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2679-2686. PubMed ID: 37138191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reply: Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction and Body Contouring: Safety and Efficacy of Current Treatment Paradigms.
    Sasaki GH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):640e-641e. PubMed ID: 26910712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction using Cooltech® Define technology: A large-sample retrospective clinical study.
    Vignoli F; Mármol GV
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():15-24. PubMed ID: 37654091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical effectiveness of non-invasive selective cryolipolysis.
    Kim J; Kim DH; Ryu HJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2014 Oct; 16(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 25046234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of Available Literature.
    Derrick CD; Shridharani SM; Broyles JM
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Sep; 35(7):830-6. PubMed ID: 26038367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Literature review of adverse events associated with cryolipolysis.
    Deligonul FZ; Yousefian F; Gold MH
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():31-36. PubMed ID: 37988712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia secondary to cryolipolysis: An underreported entity?
    Singh SM; Geddes ER; Boutrous SG; Galiano RD; Friedman PM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Aug; 47(6):476-8. PubMed ID: 26096832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective Internally Controlled Blind Reviewed Clinical Evaluation of Cryolipolysis Combined With Multipolar Radiofrequency andVaripulseTechnology for Enhanced Subject Results in Circumferential Fat Reduction and Skin Laxity of the Flanks.
    Few J; Gold M; Sadick N
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1354-1358. PubMed ID: 28095547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: a 4-month study of safety and efficacy.
    Boey GE; Wasilenchuk JL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24338439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening.
    Bernstein EF; Bloom JD
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 19(5):350-357. PubMed ID: 28426847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference.
    Kilmer SL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27327898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Systematic Review of Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia (PAH) Post-Cryolipolysis.
    Ho D; Jagdeo J
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 16(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28095535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound.
    Jewell ML; Solish NJ; Desilets CS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):901-12. PubMed ID: 21461627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active Heating following Cryolipolysis Reduces Efficacy and Side Effects: A Randomized Split-Body Trial.
    Dahmann S; Sanders A; Saarbeck C; Batsilas I; Meyer-Marcotty M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Nov; 152(5):965-975. PubMed ID: 36877615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paradoxical Adipose Hypertrophy (PAH) After Cryolipolysis.
    Stroumza N; Gauthier N; Senet P; Moguelet P; Nail Barthelemy R; Atlan M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Mar; 38(4):411-417. PubMed ID: 29145587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.