These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26017796)

  • 21. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school.
    Lancaster P; Krumm M; Ribera J; Klich R
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18840705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Ozdek A; Karacay M; Saylam G; Tatar E; Aygener N; Korkmaz MH
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Jan; 267(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 19536554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Program Review of Head Start and Elementary School Hearing Screenings.
    Hurley A; Willis M; Guidry M; Bode D; Corneille ML; Mills S
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Apr; 51(2):345-352. PubMed ID: 32216695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory functions in children at schools for the deaf.
    Karatas E; Kanlikama M; Mumbuc S
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2006 Feb; 98(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16708506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Immittance screening for aural problems in school children.
    McDermott JC
    J Sch Health; 1982 Oct; 52(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 6923958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of two methods of hearing screening in the preschool population.
    Sideris I; Glattke TJ
    J Commun Disord; 2006; 39(6):391-401. PubMed ID: 16780865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P; Bennrup S; Sheppard H
    Audiology; 1983; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a hearing screening questionnaire for use with Ecuadorian school-aged children.
    Muñoz K; Luzuriaga E; Callow-Heusser C; Ortiz E; White K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25804301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A directly comparative two-gate case-control diagnostic accuracy study of the pure tone screen and HearCheck screener tests for identifying hearing impairment in school children.
    Ukoumunne OC; Hyde C; Ozolins M; Zhelev Z; Errington S; Taylor RS; Benton C; Moody J; Cocking L; Watson J; Fortnum H
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e017258. PubMed ID: 28701413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing screening for Japanese children and young adults using the automated auditory brainstem response.
    Soares M; Nakazawa M; Ishikawa K; Sato T; Honda K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 24007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children at school entry: a comparison with pure-tone screening and tympanometry results.
    Lyons A; Kei J; Driscoll C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(10):702-15. PubMed ID: 15646668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determination of hearing levels in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever.
    Cevik C; Silfeler I; Arica V; Yengil E; Akbay E; Sarac T; Basarslan F; Akoglu E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 77(12):2040-3. PubMed ID: 24210292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical Validity of hearScreen™ Smartphone Hearing Screening for School Children.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH; Myburgh HC; Hall J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e11-7. PubMed ID: 26372265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and pure tone audiometry in occupational screening for auditory deficit due to noise exposure.
    Wooles N; Mulheran M; Bray P; Brewster M; Banerjee AR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Dec; 129(12):1174-81. PubMed ID: 26549131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of screening methods in school-aged children.
    Krueger WW; Ferguson L
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Dec; 127(6):516-9. PubMed ID: 12501102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.