These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26017815)

  • 1. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Hydrodynamics and Stresses in the PhEur/USP Disintegration Tester Under Fed and Fasted Fluid Characteristics.
    Kindgen S; Wachtel H; Abrahamsson B; Langguth P
    J Pharm Sci; 2015 Sep; 104(9):2956-68. PubMed ID: 26017815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Disintegration Tester for Solid Dosage Forms Enabling Adjustable Hydrodynamics.
    Kindgen S; Rach R; Nawroth T; Abrahamsson B; Langguth P
    J Pharm Sci; 2016 Aug; 105(8):2402-9. PubMed ID: 27422086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bio-predictive tablet disintegration: effect of water diffusivity, fluid flow, food composition and test conditions.
    Radwan A; Wagner M; Amidon GL; Langguth P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2014 Jun; 57():273-9. PubMed ID: 24036239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of disintegration of rapidly disintegrating tablets by a visiometric liquid jet-mediated disintegration apparatus.
    Desai PM; Liew CV; Heng PW
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Feb; 442(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 22985772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in USP apparatus 3-the influence of dip rate.
    Perivilli S; Kakhi M; Stippler E
    Pharm Res; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1304-15. PubMed ID: 25407541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrodynamic simulation (computational fluid dynamics) of asymmetrically positioned tablets in the paddle dissolution apparatus: impact on dissolution rate and variability.
    D'Arcy DM; Corrigan OI; Healy AM
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 57(10):1243-50. PubMed ID: 16259752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational hydrodynamic comparison of a mini vessel and a USP 2 dissolution testing system to predict the dynamic operating conditions for similarity of dissolution performance.
    Wang B; Bredael G; Armenante PM
    Int J Pharm; 2018 Mar; 539(1-2):112-130. PubMed ID: 29341921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the Hydrodynamics in the USP Basket Apparatus Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Martinez AF; Sinha K; Nere N; Slade R; Castleberry S
    J Pharm Sci; 2020 Mar; 109(3):1231-1241. PubMed ID: 31743682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Hariharan P; Giarra M; Reddy V; Day SW; Manning KB; Deutsch S; Stewart SF; Myers MR; Berman MR; Burgreen GW; Paterson EG; Malinauskas RA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engineering tools for understanding the hydrodynamics of dissolution tests.
    Kukura J; Arratia PE; Szalai ES; Muzzio FJ
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2003 Feb; 29(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 12648020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Compare Shear Rate and Turbulence in the TIM-Automated Gastric Compartment With USP Apparatus II.
    Hopgood M; Reynolds G; Barker R
    J Pharm Sci; 2018 Jul; 107(7):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29608886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP apparatus II dissolution test.
    Baxter JL; Kukura J; Muzzio FJ
    Int J Pharm; 2005 Mar; 292(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 15725550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration.
    Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G
    Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental and computational determination of the hydrodynamics of mini vessel dissolution testing systems.
    Wang B; Armenante PM
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Aug; 510(1):336-49. PubMed ID: 27317988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of the Hydrodynamics in a Miniaturized Dissolution Apparatus.
    Johansson KE; Plum J; Mosleh M; Madsen CM; Rades T; Müllertz A
    J Pharm Sci; 2018 Apr; 107(4):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 29233728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of basket mesh size on the hydrodynamics of a partially filled (500 mL) USP rotating basket dissolution testing Apparatus 1.
    Sirasitthichoke C; Patel S; Reuter KG; Hermans A; Bredael G; Armenante PM
    Int J Pharm; 2024 Jun; 658():124209. PubMed ID: 38718973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanistic investigation of food effect on disintegration and dissolution of BCS class III compound solid formulations: the importance of viscosity.
    Radwan A; Amidon GL; Langguth P
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 2012 Oct; 33(7):403-16. PubMed ID: 22782559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical Mass Transfer Analysis of Drug Particle Dissolution, Highlighting the Hydrodynamics, pH, Particle Size, and Buffer Effects for the Dissolution of Ionizable and Nonionizable Drugs in a Compendial Dissolution Vessel.
    Salehi N; Al-Gousous J; Mudie DM; Amidon GL; Ziff RM; Amidon GE
    Mol Pharm; 2020 Oct; 17(10):3870-3884. PubMed ID: 32886520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of disintegration rate is important for predicting the oral absorption of solid dosage forms containing poorly soluble weak base drugs.
    Nakamura K; Kambayashi A; Onoue S
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2022 Nov; 180():23-32. PubMed ID: 36154905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a digital twin of a tablet that mimics a real solid dosage form: Differences in the dissolution profile in conventional mini-USP II and a biorelevant colon model.
    Schütt M; Stamatopoulos K; Batchelor HK; Simmons MJH; Alexiadis A
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2022 Dec; 179():106310. PubMed ID: 36265815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.