182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26019939)
1. Radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients.
Heidenreich A; Pfister D; Thissen A; Piper C; Porres D
Arab J Urol; 2014 Jun; 12(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 26019939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-institutional comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer.
Coronato EE; Harmon JD; Ginsberg PC; Harkaway RC; Singh K; Braitman L; Sloane BB; Jaffe JS
J Robot Surg; 2009 Oct; 3(3):175. PubMed ID: 27638375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes between radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study.
Moussa M; Abou Chakra M; Peyromaure M; Barry Delongchamps N; Bailly H; Duquesne I
Urologia; 2023 Feb; 90(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 35837737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1631-7. PubMed ID: 26539008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group.
Lance RS; Freidrichs PA; Kane C; Powell CR; Pulos E; Moul JW; McLeod DG; Cornum RL; Brantley Thrasher J
BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 11121994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
Schäfers S; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Urologe A; 2009 Apr; 48(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 19145427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach.
Song W; Park JH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Aug; 15(4):e645-e652. PubMed ID: 28216277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morbidity of retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: multicenter study from Renal Transplantation Committee of French Urological Association.
Kleinclauss FM; Neuzillet Y; Tillou X; Terrier N; Guichard G; Petit J; Lechevallier E;
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1366-70. PubMed ID: 18436284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.
El-Galley RE; Keane TE; Petros JA; Sanders WH; Clarke HS; Cotsonis GA; Graham SD
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):663-7. PubMed ID: 9763090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inguinal hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach.
Matsubara A; Yoneda T; Nakamoto T; Maruyama S; Koda S; Goto K; Teishima J; Shiina H; Igawa M; Usui T
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 18158037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gillitzer R; Thomas C; Wiesner C; Jones J; Schmidt F; Hampel C; Brenner W; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Sullivan LD; Weir MJ; Kinahan JF; Taylor DL
BJU Int; 2000 Jan; 85(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 10619954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of radical perineal, radical retropubic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies in a single surgeon series.
Mirza M; Art K; Wineland L; Tawfik O; Thrasher JB
Prostate Cancer; 2011; 2011():878323. PubMed ID: 22111001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early surgical results with intent to treat by radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Abbas F; Siddiqui K; Biyabani SR; Hasan SH; Talati J
J Pak Med Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):200-5. PubMed ID: 12174491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
