279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26020346)
1. Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Rotz CA; Asem-Hiablie S; Dillon J; Bonifacio H
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2509-19. PubMed ID: 26020346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon and blue water footprints of California sheep production.
Dougherty HC; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM; DePeters EJ; Pettey LA; Macon D; Finzel J; Rodrigues K; Kebreab E
J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):945-961. PubMed ID: 30452693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.
Vergé XP; Maxime D; Dyer JA; Desjardins RL; Arcand Y; Vanderzaag A
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6091-104. PubMed ID: 23831091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.
Tedeschi LO; Beauchemin KA
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36645233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regional environmental assessment of dairy farms.
Rotz CA; Stout RC; Holly MA; Kleinman PJA
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3275-3288. PubMed ID: 32008787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.
White RR; Brady M; Capper JL; McNamara JP; Johnson KA
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3197-211. PubMed ID: 26115306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.
White RR; Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5801-12. PubMed ID: 24146151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.
Capper JL; Cady RA
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31622980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life-cycle assessment of the beef cattle production system for the northern great plains, USA.
Lupo CD; Clay DE; Benning JL; Stone JJ
J Environ Qual; 2013 Sep; 42(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24216416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carbon footprint of organic beef meat from farm to fork: a case study of short supply chain.
Vitali A; Grossi G; Martino G; Bernabucci U; Nardone A; Lacetera N
J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Nov; 98(14):5518-5524. PubMed ID: 29691877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review.
Lynch J
Environ Impact Assess Rev; 2019 May; 76():69-78. PubMed ID: 31388221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
