212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26020436)
1. Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction.
Fletcher JG; Yu L; Li Z; Manduca A; Blezek DJ; Hough DM; Venkatesh SK; Brickner GC; Cernigliaro JC; Hara AK; Fidler JL; Lake DS; Shiung M; Lewis D; Leng S; Augustine KE; Carter RE; Holmes DR; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):465-78. PubMed ID: 26020436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraindividual comparison of diagnostic performance in patients with hepatic metastasis of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source abdominal computed tomography.
Park M; Chung YE; Lee HS; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 24300843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Enterography for Active Inflammatory Terminal Ileal Crohn Disease: Comparison of Full-Dose and Half-Dose Images Reconstructed with FBP and Half-Dose Images with SAFIRE.
Gandhi NS; Baker ME; Goenka AH; Bullen JA; Obuchowski NA; Remer EM; Coppa CP; Einstein D; Feldman MK; Kanmaniraja D; Purysko AS; Vahdat N; Primak AN; Karim W; Herts BR
Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 27077382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation Dose Reduction in Pediatric Body CT Using Iterative Reconstruction and a Novel Image-Based Denoising Method.
Yu L; Fletcher JG; Shiung M; Thomas KB; Matsumoto JM; Zingula SN; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1026-37. PubMed ID: 26496550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer performance for adaptive, image-based denoising and filtered back projection compared to scanner-based iterative reconstruction for lower dose CT enterography.
Fletcher JG; Hara AK; Fidler JL; Silva AC; Barlow JM; Carter RE; Bartley A; Shiung M; Holmes DR; Weber NK; Bruining DH; Yu L; McCollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1050-9. PubMed ID: 25725794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low tube voltage intermediate tube current liver MDCT: sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yu MH; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Baek JH; Han JK; Choi BI; Flohr TG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23789655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of urolithiasis: comparison of 100% tube exposure images reconstructed with filtered back projection and 50% tube exposure images reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction.
Remer EM; Herts BR; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Greiwe A; Roesel DM; Purysko AS; Feldman MK; De S; Shah SN; Dong F; Monga M; Baker ME
Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 24814177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients.
Wang H; Tan B; Zhao B; Liang C; Xu Z
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 23916244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging.
Hardie AD; Tipnis SV; Rieter WJ; Rissing MS; De Cecco CN
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):932-6. PubMed ID: 24270115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels.
Fletcher JG; Levin DL; Sykes AG; Lindell RM; White DB; Kuzo RS; Suresh V; Yu L; Leng S; Holmes DR; Inoue A; Johnson MP; Carter RE; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 32990514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Full- and Half-Dose Image Reconstruction With Filtered Back Projection or Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction in Dual-Source Single-Energy MDCT Urography.
Kim SH; Kim MJ; Lee HJ; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):641-648. PubMed ID: 30040466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction?
Yang WJ; Yan FH; Liu B; Pang LF; Hou L; Zhang H; Pan ZL; Chen KM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 23493224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.
Baker ME; Dong F; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Einstein D; Gandhi N; Herts BR; Purysko A; Remer E; Vachhani N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 22733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
