192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26020794)
21. Spatially explicit multi-threat assessment of food tree species in Burkina Faso: A fine-scale approach.
Gaisberger H; Kindt R; Loo J; Schmidt M; Bognounou F; Da SS; Diallo OB; Ganaba S; Gnoumou A; Lompo D; Lykke AM; Mbayngone E; Nacoulma BMI; Ouedraogo M; Ouédraogo O; Parkouda C; Porembski S; Savadogo P; Thiombiano A; Zerbo G; Vinceti B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184457. PubMed ID: 28880962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mapping tree species vulnerability to multiple threats as a guide to restoration and conservation of tropical dry forests.
Fremout T; Thomas E; Gaisberger H; Van Meerbeek K; Muenchow J; Briers S; Gutierrez-Miranda CE; Marcelo-Peña JL; Kindt R; Atkinson R; Cabrera O; Espinosa CI; Aguirre-Mendoza Z; Muys B
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Jun; 26(6):3552-3568. PubMed ID: 32020698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. From eDNA to decisions using a multi-method approach to restoration planning in streams.
Adams AJ; Kamoroff C; Daniele NR; Grasso RL; Halstead BJ; Kleeman PM; Mengelt C; Powelson K; Seaborn T; Goldberg CS
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14335. PubMed ID: 38906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Learning from conservation planning for the U.S. National Wildlife Refuges.
Meretsky VJ; Fischman RL
Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1415-27. PubMed ID: 24724940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "No-regrets" pathways for navigating climate change: planning for connectivity with land use, topography, and climate.
Schloss CA; Cameron DR; McRae BH; Theobald DM; Jones A
Ecol Appl; 2022 Jan; 32(1):e02468. PubMed ID: 34614272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A vulnerability assessment of 300 species in Florida: threats from sea level rise, land use, and climate change.
Reece JS; Noss RF; Oetting J; Hoctor T; Volk M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80658. PubMed ID: 24260447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world.
Hermoso V; Januchowski-Hartley SR; Linke S
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():1038-1044. PubMed ID: 26254022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effective river rehabilitation planning: optimizing for morphological benefits at large spatial scales.
Langhans SD; Hermoso V; Linke S; Bunn SE; Possingham HP
J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():296-303. PubMed ID: 24325822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coupling systematic planning and expert judgement enhances the efficiency of river restoration.
Langhans SD; Gessner J; Hermoso V; Wolter C
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():266-73. PubMed ID: 27101463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting.
Carwardine J; Wilson KA; Watts M; Etter A; Klein CJ; Possingham HP
PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2586. PubMed ID: 18596914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.
Chadés I; Nicol S; van Leeuwen S; Walters B; Firn J; Reeson A; Martin TG; Carwardine J
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):525-36. PubMed ID: 25362843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A strategy for prioritizing threats and recovery actions for at-risk species.
Darst CR; Murphy PJ; Strout NW; Campbell SP; Field KJ; Allison L; Averill-Murray RC
Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 51(3):786-800. PubMed ID: 23322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe.
Szabolcs M; Kapusi F; Carrizo S; Markovic D; Freyhof J; Cid N; Cardoso AC; Scholz M; Kasperidus HD; Darwall WRT; Lengyel S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267801. PubMed ID: 35580083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Filling gaps in a large reserve network to address freshwater conservation needs.
Hermoso V; Filipe AF; Segurado P; Beja P
J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():358-365. PubMed ID: 26203875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ecological assessment of river networks: From reach to catchment scale.
Kuemmerlen M; Reichert P; Siber R; Schuwirth N
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):1613-1627. PubMed ID: 30308847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of future land use and climate change on river fish assemblages.
Radinger J; Hölker F; Horký P; Slavík O; Dendoncker N; Wolter C
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Apr; 22(4):1505-22. PubMed ID: 26649996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rapidly assessing cobenefits to advance threat-management alliances.
Rees MW; Carwardine J; Reeson A; Firn J
Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):843-853. PubMed ID: 32406533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity.
Reid AJ; Carlson AK; Creed IF; Eliason EJ; Gell PA; Johnson PTJ; Kidd KA; MacCormack TJ; Olden JD; Ormerod SJ; Smol JP; Taylor WW; Tockner K; Vermaire JC; Dudgeon D; Cooke SJ
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Jun; 94(3):849-873. PubMed ID: 30467930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Threat to the point: improving the value of comparative extinction risk analysis for conservation action.
Murray KA; Verde Arregoitia LD; Davidson A; Di Marco M; Di Fonzo MM
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Feb; 20(2):483-94. PubMed ID: 23966334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
