117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26020903)
1. Feed efficiency effects on barrow and gilt behavioral reactivity to novel stimuli tests.
Colpoys JD; Abell CE; Gabler NK; Keating AF; Millman ST; Siegford JM; Young JM; Johnson AK
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):1267-75. PubMed ID: 26020903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsiveness of swine divergently selected for feed efficiency to exogenous adrenocorticotropic hormone and glucose challenges.
Colpoys J; Van Sambeek D; Bruns C; Johnson A; Dekkers J; Dunshea F; Gabler N
Domest Anim Endocrinol; 2019 Jul; 68():32-38. PubMed ID: 30784946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing peripheral blood cell profile of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mpetile Z; Young JM; Gabler NK; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):892-9. PubMed ID: 26020867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of space allocation on barrow and gilt performance.
Brumm MC
J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2460-6. PubMed ID: 15318747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake.
Barea R; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Sellier P; van Milgen J; Noblet J
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2062-72. PubMed ID: 20154162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Daily feeding regimen impacts pig growth and behavior.
Colpoys JD; Johnson AK; Gabler NK
Physiol Behav; 2016 May; 159():27-32. PubMed ID: 26957037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine.
Cai W; Casey DS; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 17998435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divergent selection for residual feed intake affects the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of pig skeletal muscle.
Vincent A; Louveau I; Gondret F; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Lefaucheur L
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2745-58. PubMed ID: 26115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake.
Boddicker N; Gabler NK; Spurlock ME; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 20833771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Montagne L; Loisel F; Le Naou T; Gondret F; Gilbert H; Le Gall M
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1512-23. PubMed ID: 24496835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A transcriptome multi-tissue analysis identifies biological pathways and genes associated with variations in feed efficiency of growing pigs.
Gondret F; Vincent A; Houée-Bigot M; Siegel A; Lagarrigue S; Causeur D; Gilbert H; Louveau I
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 28327084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on early production performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake.
Boddicker N; Gabler NK; Spurlock ME; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
Animal; 2011 Aug; 5(9):1344-53. PubMed ID: 22440279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between residual feed intake and feed intake behavior in group-housed Duroc barrows.
Rauw WM; Soler J; Tibau J; Reixach J; Gomez Raya L
J Anim Sci; 2006 Apr; 84(4):956-62. PubMed ID: 16543574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute systemic inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Feye KM; Nguyen YT; Rakhshandeh A; Loving CL; Dekkers JCM; Gabler NK; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):728. PubMed ID: 31610780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence of decreased muscle protein turnover in gilts selected for low residual feed intake.
Cruzen SM; Harris AJ; Hollinger K; Punt RM; Grubbs JK; Selsby JT; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK; Lonergan SM; Huff-Lonergan E
J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):4007-16. PubMed ID: 23739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behavior and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine.
Young JM; Cai W; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 21036935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Nguyen YT; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26801403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Merlot E; Gilbert H; Le Floc'h N
J Anim Sci; 2016 Feb; 94(2):563-73. PubMed ID: 27065126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection for residual feed intake in growing pigs: effects on sow performance in a tropical climate.
Renaudeau D; Gourdine JL; Fleury J; Ferchaud S; Billon Y; Noblet J; Gilbert H
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3568-79. PubMed ID: 24987064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divergent selection for residual feed intake in group-housed growing pigs: characteristics of physical and behavioural activity according to line and sex.
Meunier-Salaün MC; Guérin C; Billon Y; Sellier P; Noblet J; Gilbert H
Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1898-906. PubMed ID: 25322792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
