These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2602104)

  • 1. [Investigation of low-contrast signal detection in computed radiography (CR)].
    Higashida Y; Matsumoto M; Yoshioka S; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1411-9. PubMed ID: 2602104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed radiography utilizing laser-stimulated luminescence: detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic objects.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Hirata Y; Morita K; Doudanuki S; Sonoda Y; Katsuda N; Hiai Y; Misumi W; Matsumoto M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1988; 12(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 3409192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image enhancement using computed radiography.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method of duplicating film using the CR system: evaluation of detectability in a simulated nodule.
    Fukuyama A; Ando S; Maeda K; Ida K; Suzuki T; Fukuyama K; Hasegawa T
    Radiat Med; 2005 Aug; 23(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 16342906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Low contrast detectability of a new CR system with two-sided reading].
    Katou T; Ogawa K; Umezu Y; Kinoshita E; Shinkai E; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Higashida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 59(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 12740564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography.
    Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal steel thickness combined with computed radiography for portal imaging of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
    Wu S; Jin X; Xie C; Cao G
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3112-6. PubMed ID: 16279063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.