These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography. Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging. De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image enhancement using computed radiography. Long BW Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems]. Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method of duplicating film using the CR system: evaluation of detectability in a simulated nodule. Fukuyama A; Ando S; Maeda K; Ida K; Suzuki T; Fukuyama K; Hasegawa T Radiat Med; 2005 Aug; 23(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 16342906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography. Doyle P; Martin CJ Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Huda W Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Film-screen digital radiography. Schwenker RP; Eger H Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Low contrast detectability of a new CR system with two-sided reading]. Katou T; Ogawa K; Umezu Y; Kinoshita E; Shinkai E; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Higashida Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 59(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 12740564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography. Launders JH; Cowen AR Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal steel thickness combined with computed radiography for portal imaging of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Wu S; Jin X; Xie C; Cao G Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3112-6. PubMed ID: 16279063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]