302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26022502)
1. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for bladder augmentation: in vivo, long term, and functional pilot study.
Hidas G; Lee HJ; Bahoric A; Kelly MS; Watts B; Liu Z; Saharti S; Lusch A; Alamsahebpour A; Kerbl D; Truong H; Zi X; Khoury AE
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Oct; 11(5):260.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26022502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments for porcine bladder augmentation in vivo: a 6-week experimental study.
Hafez AT; Afshar K; Bägli DJ; Bahoric A; Aitken K; Smith CR; Khoury AE
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 2):1663-7; discussion 1667-8. PubMed ID: 16148677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aerosol transfer of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells onto demucosalized colonic segments: a pilot study.
Hafez AT; Bagli DJ; Bahoric A; Aitken K; Smith CR; Herz D; Khoury AE
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2316-9; discussion 2320. PubMed ID: 12771789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autologous cell seeded biodegradable scaffold for augmentation cystoplasty: phase II study in children and adolescents with spina bifida.
Joseph DB; Borer JG; De Filippo RE; Hodges SJ; McLorie GA
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1389-95. PubMed ID: 24184366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-epithelialization of demucosalized stomach patch with tissue-engineered urothelial mucosa combined with Botox A in bladder augmentation.
Zhang Y; Liu G; Kropp BP
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E106-12. PubMed ID: 22288946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype.
Fraser M; Thomas DF; Pitt E; Harnden P; Trejdosiewicz LK; Southgate J
BJU Int; 2004 Mar; 93(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 15008741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determinants of success and failure of seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium.
González R; Ludwikowski B; Horst M
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4 Suppl):1781-4. PubMed ID: 19692035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transplantation of autologous differentiated urothelium in an experimental model of composite cystoplasty.
Turner A; Subramanian R; Thomas DF; Hinley J; Abbas SK; Stahlschmidt J; Southgate J
Eur Urol; 2011 Mar; 59(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 21195539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prerequisite for successful surgical outcome in urothelium lined seromuscular colocystoplasty.
Jung HJ; Lee H; Im YJ; Lee YS; Hong CH; Han SW
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1416-21. PubMed ID: 22341808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autologous transplantation of urothelium into demucosalized gastrointestinal segments: evidence for epithelialization and differentiation of in vitro expanded and transplanted urothelial cells.
Schaefer BM; Lorenz C; Back W; Moll R; Sun TT; Schober C; Waag KL; Kramer MD
J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 9400496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First prize: ureteral segmental replacement revisited.
El-Hakim A; Marcovich R; Chiu KY; Lee BR; Smith AD
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1069-74. PubMed ID: 16283842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enteric mucosal regrowth after bladder augmentation using demucosalized gut segments.
Dewan PA; Close CE; Byard RW; Ashwood PJ; Mitchell ME
J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 2):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9258158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urothelial lined colocystoplasty in a sheep model.
Dewan PA; Lorenz C; Stefanek W; Byard RW
Eur Urol; 1994; 26(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 7805710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autoaugmentation demucosalized enterocystoplasty.
Dewan PA
World J Urol; 1998; 16(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 9775424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term histological and mucin alterations in the neobladder mucosa following urinary bladder augmentation or substitution with gastrointestinal segment.
Kispal ZF; Kardos D; Jilling T; Kereskai L; Isaacs M; Balogh DL; Pinter AB; Till H; Vajda P
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):349.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26298391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seromuscular grafts for bladder reconstruction: extra-luminal demucosalisation of the bowel.
Subramaniam R; Turner AM; Abbas SK; Thomas DF; Southgate J
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 23107403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevention of colonic mucosal regrowth after seromuscular enterocystoplasty.
Kïbar Y; Tahmaz L; Ongürü O; Dayanç M
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):2059-62. PubMed ID: 11371928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined with urothelium: experimental study.
Buson H; Manivel JC; Dayanç M; Long R; Gonzalez R
Urology; 1994 Nov; 44(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 7974949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bladder augmentation with different forms of intestinal grafts: an experimental study in the pig.
Clementson Kockum C; Willén R; Malmfors G
BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 10233500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Seromuscular colocystoplasty lined by urothelium. Experimental study in rats].
Blanco Bruned JL; Alvarez Díaz JF; Sáez López A; Oliver Llinares F; Prado Fernández C; González Landa G
Cir Pediatr; 2001 Oct; 14(4):162-7. PubMed ID: 12601965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
