BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26022558)

  • 1. Estimating the concordance probability in a survival analysis with a discrete number of risk groups.
    Heller G; Mo Q
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):263-79. PubMed ID: 26022558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
    Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating a time-dependent concordance index for survival prediction models with covariate dependent censoring.
    Gerds TA; Kattan MW; Schumacher M; Yu C
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(13):2173-84. PubMed ID: 23172755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating twin concordance for bivariate competing risks twin data.
    Scheike TH; Holst KK; Hjelmborg JB
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1193-204. PubMed ID: 24132877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.
    Wolbers M; Blanche P; Koller MT; Witteman JC; Gerds TA
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jul; 15(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 24493091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes.
    Cheung LC; Pan Q; Hyun N; Katki HA
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2868-2882. PubMed ID: 30957257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regression models for the restricted residual mean life for right-censored and left-truncated data.
    Cortese G; Holmboe SA; Scheike TH
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1803-1822. PubMed ID: 28106926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic Factors for Survival in Noncastrate Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Validation of the Glass Model and Development of a Novel Simplified Prognostic Model.
    Gravis G; Boher JM; Fizazi K; Joly F; Priou F; Marino P; Latorzeff I; Delva R; Krakowski I; Laguerre B; Walz J; Rolland F; Théodore C; Deplanque G; Ferrero JM; Pouessel D; Mourey L; Beuzeboc P; Zanetta S; Habibian M; Berdah JF; Dauba J; Baciuchka M; Platini C; Linassier C; Labourey JL; Machiels JP; El Kouri C; Ravaud A; Suc E; Eymard JC; Hasbini A; Bousquet G; Soulie M; Oudard S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 25277272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addressing issues associated with evaluating prediction models for survival endpoints based on the concordance statistic.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 26756274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-institutional validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict disease recurrence and mortality after radical prostatectomy.
    Punnen S; Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 23587869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantile regression models for survival data with missing censoring indicators.
    Qiu Z; Ma H; Chen J; Dinse GE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1320-1331. PubMed ID: 33826461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the Most Influential Factors for Survival Probability Prediction of Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Stanković J; Stanković M
    Cancer Invest; 2017 Oct; 35(9):594-600. PubMed ID: 29064739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling.
    Stajduhar I; Dalbelo-Basić B; Bogunović N
    Artif Intell Med; 2009 Nov; 47(3):199-217. PubMed ID: 19833488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A robust weighted Kaplan-Meier approach for data with dependent censoring using linear combinations of prognostic covariates.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2215-23. PubMed ID: 20812302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
    Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating lifetime or episode-of-illness costs under censoring.
    Basu A; Manning WG
    Health Econ; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1010-28. PubMed ID: 20665908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond D'Amico risk classes for predicting recurrence after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the Candiolo classifier.
    Gabriele D; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Krengli M; Garibaldi E; Tessa M; Moro G; Girelli G; Gabriele P;
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Feb; 11():23. PubMed ID: 26911291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ability of C-reactive protein to complement multiple prognostic classifiers in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
    Pond GR; Armstrong AJ; Wood BA; Leopold L; Galsky MD; Sonpavde G
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E461-8. PubMed ID: 22520631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.
    Howe CJ; Cole SR; Lau B; Napravnik S; Eron JJ
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26484424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. About an adaptively weighted Kaplan-Meier estimate.
    Plante JF
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Sep; 15(3):295-315. PubMed ID: 19533346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.