These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26023637)

  • 21. Nordic dentists' knowledge and attitudes on dental amalgam from health and environmental perspectives.
    Ylinen K; Löfroth G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Oct; 60(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 12418724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Has the implementation of the Minamata convention had an impact on the practice of operative dentistry in Jordan?
    Al-Asmar AA; Al-Khatib KM; Al-Amad TZ; Sawair FA
    J Int Med Res; 2019 Jan; 47(1):361-369. PubMed ID: 30282511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 28422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 28937890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Managing the phase-down of amalgam amongst Nigerian dental professionals and students: A national survey.
    Makanjuola JO; Umesi DC; Ndukwe AN; Enone LL; Sotunde OA; Omo JO; Idon PI; Alalade O; Adebayo GE; Ekowmwnhenhen UI; Arotiba GT
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Nov; 24(4):666-678. PubMed ID: 32534475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 1: a review.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong RH
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):408-19. PubMed ID: 25090909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between amalgam restorations and mercury levels in male dentists and nondental health professionals.
    Joshi A; Douglass CW; Kim HD; Joshipura KJ; Park MC; Rimm EB; Carino MJ; Garcia RI; Morris JS; Willett WC
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 12597586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry.
    Zimmerman JA; Feigal RJ; Till MJ; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 19320262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dental amalgam: effects of alloy/mercury mixing ratio, uses and waste management.
    Kefi I; Maria A; Majid Z; Sana J; Afreen M; Fareed M; Feroze A; Sajid H; Adel S; Iftikhar A; Yawer A; Kaleem M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 23472410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amalgam phase-out, an environmental safety concern: a cross-sectional study among general dental practitioners in Pakistan.
    Khan S; Khalid N; Bajwa O; Qamar T; Kazmi A; Tariq A
    East Mediterr Health J; 2022 Jan; 28(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 35165880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct restorative material use of selected practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Brunton PA; Hickel R; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Oct; 9(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 12483789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentists' perspective about dental amalgam: current use and future direction.
    Bakhurji E; Scott T; Mangione T; Sohn W
    J Public Health Dent; 2017 Jun; 77(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 28070905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.