These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26023637)

  • 41. Phase down of amalgam. Awareness of Minamata convention among Jordanian dentists.
    Al-Rabab'ah MA; Bustani MA; Khraisat AS; Sawair FA
    Saudi Med J; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1381-1386. PubMed ID: 27874155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I; Skodje F
    Int Dent J; 1999 Jun; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 10858750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fear of amalgam: dentists' experiences in the Nordic countries.
    Widström E; Birn H; Haugejorden O; Sundberg H
    Int Dent J; 1992 Apr; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 1624200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors Associated with Pediatric Dentists' Choice of Amalgam: Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Approach.
    Bakhurji E; Scott T; Sohn W
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2019 Jul; 4(3):246-254. PubMed ID: 30931719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 May; 13(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 12752914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: I. Material Choice.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 28281954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Mercury exposure and dentists' health status in two regions of centrall Morocco: descriptive cross-sectional survey].
    Attiya N; Fattahi R; El-Haidani A; Lahrach N; Amarouch MY; Filali-Zegzouti Y
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():110. PubMed ID: 32821321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth.
    Eley BM
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jul; 183(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9254957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Mercury impregnation in dentists and dental assistants in Monastir city, Tunisia].
    Chaari N; Kerkeni A; Saadeddine S; Neffati F; Khalfallah T; Akrout M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 19419743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. French dentists' restorative treatment decisions.
    Doméjean-Orliaguet S; Tubert-Jeannin S; Riordan PJ; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 15646946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 9083577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Urinary mercury concentrations in Finnish dentists.
    Lehto T; Alanen P; Rönnemaa T; Helenius H; Kallio V
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1989; 85(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 2594745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Longevity of dental amalgam in comparison to composite materials.
    Antony K; Genser D; Hiebinger C; Windisch F
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2008 Nov; 4():Doc12. PubMed ID: 21289917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.