These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26023674)
1. Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus. Lee J; Kim S; Nam EJ; Hwang SM; Kim YT; Kim SW Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2015 May; 58(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 26023674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases. Kim SM; Park EK; Jeung IC; Kim CJ; Lee YS Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 25488157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Yim GW; Jung YW; Paek J; Lee SH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20417481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of postoperative pain after transumbilical single-port access and conventional three-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Chung JH; Baek JM; Chung K; Park EK; Jeung IC; Chang HT; Choi JH; Kim CJ; Lee YS Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1290-6. PubMed ID: 26342188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Yoon BS; Seong SJ; Kim IH; Song T; Kim ML; Kim MK Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 25510688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Noh JJ; Jeon JE; Jung JH; Kim TJ J Pers Med; 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37511791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between transumbilical and transvaginal morcellation of a large uterus during single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Oh SJ; Lee SY; Kim WY; Kang J; Han KH; Lee SH; Park JS Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2020 May; 63(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 32489984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy with Korean-made OCTO Port: Turkish surgeons' initial experience. Kale A; Terzi H; Yavuz A; Kale E J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016; 36(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 26408502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hatta K; Terai Y; Okuda K; Nakamura Y; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Hayashi A; Yamashita Y; Ohmichi M J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 23379476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri. Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Very Large Uteri: a Retrospective Single-Center Experience at a Major University Hospital. Schöller D; Taran FA; Wallwiener M; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Abele H; Neis F; Wallwiener CW; Brucker S Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2017 Mar; 77(3):251-256. PubMed ID: 28392578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy. Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. Song T; Lee Y; Kim ML; Yoon BS; Joo WD; Seong SJ; Kim IH Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 23207276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic vaginal vault closure with conventional straight instruments in single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Park D; Kim J; Jun HS; Jeong H; Park Y Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2013 Nov; 56(6):389-99. PubMed ID: 24396818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g. Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams. Kim HB; Song JE; Kim GH; Cho HY; Lee KY J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 20598052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations. Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]