These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26023722)

  • 1. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
    Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.
    Wei N; Jiao Z; Ellett K; Ku AY; Liu S; Middleton R; Li X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13164-13173. PubMed ID: 34549588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China.
    Li K; Yang J; Wei Y
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt B):116824. PubMed ID: 36442336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic feasibility and policy incentive analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in coal-fired power plants based on system dynamics.
    Ye J; Yan L; Liu X; Wei F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):37487-37515. PubMed ID: 36572778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
    Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
    Bergerson JA; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Morel B; Apt J; Chen C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7980-6. PubMed ID: 18186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decision analysis model for reducing carbon emission from coal-fired power plants and its compensatory units.
    Kumari S; Bera S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113829. PubMed ID: 34592669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.