These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26024584)
21. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study. van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence. Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps. IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A; Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates increase from 45 years of age. Karsenti D; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Cattan P; Cavicchi M World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 25(4):447-456. PubMed ID: 30700941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist. Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colonoscopy practice for veterans within and outside the Veterans Affairs setting: a matched cohort study. Bartel MJ; Robertson DJ; Pohl H Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Aug; 84(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 26784365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome. Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prevalence and characteristics of incidental colorectal polyps in patients undergoing colonoscopy at a South African tertiary institution. Kruger J; Katsidzira L; Setshedi M; Thomson SR S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 33403964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enhanced flat adenoma detection rate with high definition colonoscopy plus i-scan for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Rodríguez-D Jesus A; Saperas E Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2016 May; 108(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 27023867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor? Yang PF; Wong SW Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Apr; 26(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 26813239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors. Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]