297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26026283)
1. Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS.
Laakso I; Tanaka S; Koyama S; De Santis V; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(5):906-13. PubMed ID: 26026283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study.
Laakso I; Tanaka S; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Sadato N; Hirata A
Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():140-151. PubMed ID: 27188218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-controlled tDCS reduces electric field intensity variability at a cortical target site.
Evans C; Bachmann C; Lee JSA; Gregoriou E; Ward N; Bestmann S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):125-136. PubMed ID: 31653475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TMS Motor Thresholds Correlate With TDCS Electric Field Strengths in Hand Motor Area.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Sumiya M; Koyama S; Hirata A; Tanaka S
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():426. PubMed ID: 29988501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex?
Laakso I; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Hirata A; Tanaka S
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):626. PubMed ID: 30679770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. tDCS induced GABA change is associated with the simulated electric field in M1, an effect mediated by grey matter volume in the MRS voxel.
Nandi T; Puonti O; Clarke WT; Nettekoven C; Barron HC; Kolasinski J; Hanayik T; Hinson EL; Berrington A; Bachtiar V; Johnstone A; Winkler AM; Thielscher A; Johansen-Berg H; Stagg CJ
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(5):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35988862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulation Effect of Inter-subject Variability in tDCS-Multi-scale Modeling Study.
Im C; Seo H; Jun SC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3092-3095. PubMed ID: 30441048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural correlates of unihemispheric and bihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in healthy young adults.
Lindenberg R; Sieg MM; Meinzer M; Nachtigall L; Flöel A
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():141-9. PubMed ID: 26851696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does the electric field induced by tDCS influence motor-related connectivity? Model-guided perspectives.
Fernandes SR; Callejón-Leblic MA; Ferreira HA
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38266295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study
Thomas C; Ghodratitoostani I; Delbem ACB; Ali A; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5196-5199. PubMed ID: 31947029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of tDCS stimulation of motor cortex and cerebellum on EEG classification of motor imagery and sensorimotor band power.
Angulo-Sherman IN; Rodríguez-Ugarte M; Sciacca N; Iáñez E; Azorín JM
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):31. PubMed ID: 28420382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COMETS2: An advanced MATLAB toolbox for the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Lee C; Jung YJ; Lee SJ; Im CH
J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Feb; 277():56-62. PubMed ID: 27989592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.
Antonenko D; Grittner U; Saturnino G; Nierhaus T; Thielscher A; Flöel A
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117413. PubMed ID: 33011418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
