These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26026283)

  • 21. Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Antonenko D; Grittner U; Saturnino G; Nierhaus T; Thielscher A; Flöel A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117413. PubMed ID: 33011418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Polarity-independent effects of tDCS on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.
    Faber H; Opitz A; Müller-Dahlhaus F; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 28822654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor or somatosensory cortices on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.
    Sugawara K; Onishi H; Yamashiro K; Kojima S; Miyaguchi S; Kirimoto H; Tsubaki A; Tamaki H; Shirozu H; Kameyama S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jan; 126(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 24856461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Leg Motor Cortex Enhances Coordinated Motor Output During Walking With a Large Inter-Individual Variability.
    van Asseldonk EH; Boonstra TA
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26553475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study.
    Mizutani-Tiebel Y; Takahashi S; Karali T; Mezger E; Bulubas L; Papazova I; Dechantsreiter E; Stoecklein S; Papazov B; Thielscher A; Padberg F; Keeser D
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():103011. PubMed ID: 35487132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
    Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
    J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment.
    van der Cruijsen J; Dooren RF; Schouten AC; Oostendorp TF; Frens MA; Ribbers GM; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; Selles RW;
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 36():103178. PubMed ID: 36084558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computation of group-level electric field in lower limb motor area for different tDCS montages.
    Hamajima H; Gomez-Tames J; Uehara S; Otaka Y; Tanaka S; Hirata A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jun; 150():69-78. PubMed ID: 37023635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Primary Motor Versus Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices: Proof-of-Concept Study Investigating Functional Connectivity of Thalamocortical Networks Specific to Sensory-Affective Information Processing.
    Sankarasubramanian V; Cunningham DA; Potter-Baker KA; Beall EB; Roelle SM; Varnerin NM; Machado AG; Jones SE; Lowe MJ; Plow EB
    Brain Connect; 2017 Apr; 7(3):182-196. PubMed ID: 28142257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Opitz A; Paulus W; Will S; Antunes A; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():140-50. PubMed ID: 25613437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prefrontal versus motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on post-surgical opioid use.
    Borckardt JJ; Reeves ST; Milliken C; Carter B; Epperson TI; Gunselman RJ; Madan A; Del Schutte H; Demos HA; George MS
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1096-1101. PubMed ID: 28917592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
    Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Children and Adults.
    Ciechanski P; Carlson HL; Yu SS; Kirton A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():268. PubMed ID: 30018543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.
    Tomio R; Akiyama T; Horikoshi T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():157-67. PubMed ID: 26391774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.
    Hulst T; John L; Küper M; van der Geest JN; Göricke SL; Donchin O; Timmann D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):732-748. PubMed ID: 28469001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
    Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.