These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26026921)
1. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals? Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Srinivas SK; Small DS; Macheras M; Hsu JY; Caldwell D; Lorch S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):770.e1-770.e9. PubMed ID: 27530491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model. Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in childbirth services in California: a cross-sectional survey of childbirth hospitals. Korst LM; Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Wyatt L; Gregory KD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):523.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26275353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean. Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of a laborist program and evaluation of the effect upon cesarean delivery. Iriye BK; Huang WH; Condon J; Hancock L; Hancock JK; Ghamsary M; Garite TJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):251.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23904102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean. Xu X; Lee HC; Lin H; Lundsberg LS; Campbell KH; Lipkind HS; Pettker CM; Illuzzi JL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):98.e1-98.e14. PubMed ID: 30278176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Obstetrician/Gynecologist Hospitalists on Quality of Obstetric Care (Cesarean Delivery Rates, Trial of Labor After Cesarean/Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Rates, and Neonatal Adverse Events). Iriye BK Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Sep; 42(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 26333637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Collaborative Laborist and Midwifery Model: An Accepted and Sustainable Model. Krolikowski-Ulmer K; Watson TJ; Westhoff EM; Ashmore SL; Thompson PA; Landeen LB S D Med; 2018 Dec; 71(12):534-537. PubMed ID: 30835985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Predictors of birth outcomes related to women with a previous caesarean section: experience of a Motherhood Center, Bizerte]. Ayachi A; Derouich S; Morjene I; Mkaouer L; Mnaser D; Mourali M Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 25():76. PubMed ID: 28292039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Academic Hospitalists on Labor and Delivery Outcomes. Corey J; Cuartas K; Leidlein C; Pineles B; Wagner S Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 32516793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women]. Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laborist model of care: who is using it? Srinivas SK; Shocksnider J; Caldwell D; Lorch S J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 21506656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity. Young CB; Liu S; Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Pressey T; Liston RM; Joseph KS; CMAJ; 2018 May; 190(18):E556-E564. PubMed ID: 29735533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates. Nijagal MA; Kuppermann M; Nakagawa S; Cheng Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 212(4):491.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25446697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital. Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida. SebastiĆ£o YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG; Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]