These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2602728)

  • 21. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
    Günes ÜY; Efteli E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Dutch pressure sore assessment score or the Norton scale for identifying at-risk nursing home patients?
    van Marum RJ; Ooms ME; Ribbe MW; van Eijk JT
    Age Ageing; 2000 Jan; 29(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 10690698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale].
    Torra i Bou JE
    Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk assessment of pressure sores: a comparative study of Norton and Waterlow scores.
    Dealey C
    Nurs Stand Spec Suppl; 1989 Apr; (3):11-2. PubMed ID: 2716916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools.
    Smith LN; Booth N; Douglas D; Robertson WR; Walker A; Durie M; Fraser A; Hillan EH; Swaffield J
    J Clin Nurs; 1995 May; 4(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 7773524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
    Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The development of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures: inadequate nursing documentation is still a problem.
    Gunningberg L; Lindholm C; Carlsson M; Sjödén PO
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 May; 31(5):1155-64. PubMed ID: 10840249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Norton v. Waterlow.
    Wardman C
    Nurs Times; 1991 Mar 27-Apr 2; 87(13):74, 76, 78. PubMed ID: 2008374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Successful use of the Norton score in pressure sore prevention.
    Lockyer-Stevens N
    Prof Nurse; 1995 May; 10(8):488. PubMed ID: 7761488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Norton score and pressure sore prevention. Critique.
    Waterlow J; Vernon MJ; Bennett G; Gilchrist B
    J Wound Care; 1996 Feb; 5(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 8697139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The Norton scale as an instrument for the prevention of decubitus ulcers within the framework of quality assurance. Familiarity and acceptance--possible consequences for practice instruction].
    Plogmann S
    Krankenpfl J; 1996 Nov; 34(11):490-8. PubMed ID: 8998002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A pressure sore risk scale for use with older people.
    McCormack HC
    Prof Nurse; 1996 Jul; 11(10):673-4, 676. PubMed ID: 8718376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pressure sore prevention in a hospice.
    Bale S; Finlay I; Harding KG
    J Wound Care; 1995 Nov; 4(10):465-8. PubMed ID: 8548573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interrater variability in a modified Norton Scale.
    Ek AC; Bjurulf P
    Scand J Caring Sci; 1987; 1(3-4):99-102. PubMed ID: 3447259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.
    Sardo P; Simões C; Alvarelhão J; Costa C; Simões CJ; Figueira J; Simões JL; Amado F; Amaro A; Melo E
    J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3165-76. PubMed ID: 26316350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly.
    Bergstrom N; Braden B
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Aug; 40(8):747-58. PubMed ID: 1634717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.
    Watkinson C
    Prof Nurse; 1996 Aug; 11(11):751-2, 755-6. PubMed ID: 8718321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.
    Magnan MA; Maklebust J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Examination of care-planning needs for elderly newly admitted to an acute care setting.
    Zulkowski K; Kindsfater D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jan; 46(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 10732634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.