These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2602870)
1. [Home self-monitoring of at-risk pregnancies]. Uzan S; Uzan M; Salat-Baroux J; Sureau C Rev Prat; 1989 Nov; 39(27):2441-2. PubMed ID: 2602870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone]. Pan J; Ye M; Du X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the biophysical profile to assess fetal wellbeing. Lalor J; Devane D Pract Midwife; 2010 Jun; 13(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 20586342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Telemedicine for antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies with ambulatory and home fetal heart rate monitoring--an update. Hod M; Kerner R J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12825474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Fetal home telemonitoring: the Nancy experience from 1992-1997. analysis of 12649 recordings]. Quemere MP; Boutroy JL; Fresson J; Abel F; Barbarino-Monnier P J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Oct; 29(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 11084464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical application of the expert type terminal of remote electronic fetal heart rate home monitoring system]. Su F; Guo X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 12411023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Importance of fetal cardiac rhythm monitoring at home in the follow-up of pregnancies at risk: evaluation following 2 years of utilization]. Barbarino-Monnier P; Prato E; Thoumsin H; Lambotte R Rev Med Liege; 1992 Sep; 47(9):461-9. PubMed ID: 1410975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Management of pregnant women and newborns in high-risk pregnancies]. Grandjean H; Arnaud C; Taminh M; Blondel B J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(2 Suppl):21-36. PubMed ID: 10049003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Problems in monitoring multiple pregnancy]. Künzel W Gynakologe; 1989 Jun; 22(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 2670701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies. Cederlind CJ J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Corinne: a mother at risk. Cranley MS Am J Nurs; 1978 Dec; 78(12):2119-20. PubMed ID: 251413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical telecommunication network system for home monitoring. Horio H; Murakami M; Chiba Y; Inada H Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Mar; 32(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 8022224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of fetal heart rate decelerations in self-referred low-risk patients in the third trimester. Geraci JF; Chez RA; Fuentes A J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 9360187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting. Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The monitoring of high-risk pregnancy by non-stressed antepartum cardiotocography. Kulkarni S; Matadial L West Indian Med J; 1985 Sep; 34(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 4072183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]