125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26029024)
1. Doppler ultrasound for diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma: efficacy of ultrasound-based screening score.
Nagano S; Yahiro Y; Yokouchi M; Setoguchi T; Ishidou Y; Sasaki H; Shimada H; Kawamura I; Komiya S
Radiol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 49(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 26029024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The utility of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of breast tumour vascularity: comparison with colour and power Doppler imaging regarding diagnostic performance.
Park AY; Seo BK; Woo OH; Jung KS; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Cha J
Clin Radiol; 2018 Mar; 73(3):304-311. PubMed ID: 29122223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters.
Morii T; Kishino T; Shimamori N; Motohashi M; Ohnishi H; Honya K; Aoyagi T; Tajima T; Ichimura S
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jan; 45(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 28634807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1527-32. PubMed ID: 7654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating between benign and malignant superficial soft tissue tumours and tumour-like lesions.
Jeon JY; Chung HW; Lee MH; Lee SH; Shin MJ
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20150929. PubMed ID: 26892266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of DTI and ARFI imaging in differential diagnosis of parotid tumours.
Yu J; Du Y; Lu Y; Zhang W; Zhang D; Wang G; Li C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160100. PubMed ID: 27351345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of three dimensional (3-D) ultrasound and power Doppler in identification of high risk endometrial cancer at a tertiary care hospital in southern India: A preliminary study.
Pandey H; Guruvare S; Kadavigere R; Rao CR
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 57(4):522-527. PubMed ID: 30122571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound for initial evaluation and triage of clinically suspicious soft-tissue masses.
Lakkaraju A; Sinha R; Garikipati R; Edward S; Robinson P
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 19414084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: harmonic versus nonharmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Liang WM; Lin C; Kuo SJ; Chen DR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 19041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination IETA Ultrasonographic Characteristics Simple Scoring Method With Tumor Biomarkers Effectively Improves the Differentiation Ability of Benign and Malignant Lesions in Endometrium and Uterine Cavity.
Lin D; Zhao L; Zhu Y; Huang Y; Yuan K; Liu W; Li S; Guo X; Hao Y
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():605847. PubMed ID: 34527571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of US and MRI in Predicting Malignancy of Soft Tissue Masses: Using a Scoring System.
Shu H; Ma Q; Li A; Wang P; Gao Y; Yao Q; Hu Y; Ye X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():853232. PubMed ID: 35574339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for discrimination between benign and malignant endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness of at least 4.5 mm.
Opolskiene G; Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 19902471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Doppler analysis of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumours help predict tumour malignancy?
Griffith JF; Chan DP; Kumta SM; Chow LT; Ahuja AT
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 15041458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant breast masses.
Mehdikhani B; Benam M; Moradkhani A; Roostaee A; Bahman SS; Barmayoon P; Dezyani G; Safarpour Lima Z
Eur J Transl Myol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38536011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
