These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26029072)

  • 1. Age-related processing strategies and go-nogo effects in task-switching: an ERP study.
    Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():177. PubMed ID: 26029072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task switching and bilingualism in young and older adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    López Zunini RA; Morrison C; Kousaie S; Taler V
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Oct; 133():107186. PubMed ID: 31513809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Eroh J; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():285-93. PubMed ID: 25823764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An information theoretical approach to task-switching: evidence from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Barceló F; Periáñez JA; Nyhus E
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2007; 1():13. PubMed ID: 18958226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of age in the search for ERP biomarkers of aMCI.
    Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Mar; 142():108-115. PubMed ID: 30721717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching.
    Jamadar S; Hughes M; Fulham WR; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):432-49. PubMed ID: 20123028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Account of the Effect of Switch Probability on Switch and Mixing Costs: An ERP Study in a Cued Task-switching Paradigm.
    Wenwen C; Yang Y; Cui L; Chen Y; Zhang W; Zhang X; Zhou S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2022 Dec; 35(4):230-246. PubMed ID: 36136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targets and non-targets in the aging brain: A go/nogo event-related potential study.
    Vallesi A
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20974222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP Correlates of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control in Treatment-Naïve Adult ADHD.
    Grane VA; Brunner JF; Endestad T; Aasen IE; Kropotov J; Knight RT; Solbakk AK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159833. PubMed ID: 27448275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It's not me, it's you - Differential neural processing of social and non-social nogo cues in joint action.
    Peterburs J; Liepelt R; Voegler R; Ocklenburg S; Straube T
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(1):114-124. PubMed ID: 29115181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intertrial RT variability affects level of target-related interference in cued task switching.
    Provost A; Jamadar S; Heathcote A; Brown SD; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28776698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching.
    Adrover-Roig D; Barceló F
    Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):434-50. PubMed ID: 19889406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-differential effects on updating cue information: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Schmitt H; Ferdinand NK; Kray J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 14(3):1115-31. PubMed ID: 24590394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of task switching during single and mixed-task conditions.
    Goffaux P; Phillips NA; Sinai M; Pushkar D
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Jun; 72(3):278-90. PubMed ID: 16413655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of children's performance and ERP components in the equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Jan; 171():12-19. PubMed ID: 34852243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.