These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26030208)

  • 1. THE EFFECT OF THE "EVOKING FREEDOM" TECHNIQUE ON AN UNUSUAL AND DISTURBING REQUEST.
    Guéguen N; Silone F; David M; Pascual A
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Jun; 116(3):936-40. PubMed ID: 26030208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Free to Say No": Evoking freedom increased compliance in two field experiments.
    Farley SD; Kelly J; Singh S; Thornton C; Young T
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 30183546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-ball and compliance to a request: an application in a field setting.
    Guéguen N; Pascual A; Dagot L
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Aug; 91(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 12353806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foot-in-the-door technique using a courtship request: a field experiment.
    Guéguen N; Marchand M; Pascual A; Lourel M
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Oct; 103(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 19102478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Request solicitation and semantic evocation of freedom: an evaluation in a computer-mediated communication context.
    Guéguen N; Pascual A; Jacob C; Morineau T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Aug; 95(1):208-12. PubMed ID: 12365255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliments and receptivity to a courtship request: a field experiment.
    Guéguen N; Fischer-Lokou J; Lamy L
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Feb; 112(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 23654039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Door-in-the-Face and But-You-Are-Free: Testing the Effect of Combining Two No-Pressure Compliance Paradigms.
    Meineri S; Dupré M; Guéguen N; Vallée B
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Aug; 119(1):276-89. PubMed ID: 27381413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing compliance with a request: two touches are more effective than one.
    Vaidis DC; Halimi-Falkowicz SG
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Aug; 103(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18982940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empathy and generalized reciprocity in compliance with requests for help.
    Allsop KI; Fifield K; Seiter JS
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Aug; 91(1):241-2. PubMed ID: 12353787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Door-in-the-face technique and delay to fulfill the final request: an evaluation with a request to give blood.
    Guéguen N
    J Psychol; 2014; 148(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 25087319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a smile: reciprocation and compliance with a request.
    Vrugt A
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Dec; 101(3 Pt 2):1196-202. PubMed ID: 18361136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mimicry and helping behavior: an evaluation of mimicry on explicit helping request.
    Guéguen N; Martin A; Meineri S
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21375122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood donation and the foot-in-the-door technique: a limiting case.
    Foss RD; Dempsey CB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1979 Apr; 37(4):580-90. PubMed ID: 448633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of initial request size and timing of a second request on compliance: the foot in the door and the door in the face.
    Cann A; Sherman SJ; Elkes R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Nov; 32(5):774-82. PubMed ID: 1185513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Door-in-the-face: is it really necessary that both requests be made by the same requester?
    Terrier L; Marfaing B; Boldi MO
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Oct; 113(2):675-82. PubMed ID: 24597457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. If you need help, just ask: underestimating compliance with direct requests for help.
    Flynn FJ; Lake VK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Jul; 95(1):128-43. PubMed ID: 18605856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Touch, awareness of touch, and compliance with a request.
    Guéguen N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):355-60. PubMed ID: 12434826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When Legitimizing a Request Increases Compliance: The Legitimizing Object Technique.
    Guéguen N; Pascual A; Silone F; David M
    J Soc Psychol; 2015; 155(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 25811633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commitment and the responsive bystander: a field evaluation with a less problematic request.
    Guéguen N
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Oct; 115(2):607-11. PubMed ID: 25153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of touch on a large request: a field setting.
    Guéguen N; Fischer-Lokou J
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Feb; 90(1):267-9. PubMed ID: 11898995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.