These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26030628)

  • 1. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 16569154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience.
    Warker JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22686839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):821-8. PubMed ID: 20438279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.
    Anderson ND; Dell GS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3617-3622. PubMed ID: 29555766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sleep underpins the plasticity of language production.
    Gaskell MG; Warker J; Lindsay S; Frost R; Guest J; Snowdon R; Stackhouse A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1457-65. PubMed ID: 24894583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.
    Warker JA; Dell GS; Whalen CA; Gereg S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 18763905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not.
    Bian Y; Dell GS
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):176-187. PubMed ID: 31879827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An onset is an onset: Evidence from abstraction of newly-learned phonotactic constraints.
    Bernard A
    J Mem Lang; 2015 Jan; 78():18-32. PubMed ID: 25378800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.
    Warker JA; Xu Y; Dell GS; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 19398099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel phonotactic learning by children and infants: Generalizing syllable-position but not co-occurrence regularities.
    Bernard A; Onishi KH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Jan; 225():105493. PubMed ID: 36007352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The different time course of phonotactic constraint learning in children and adults: Evidence from speech errors.
    Smalle EHM; Muylle M; Szmalec A; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28383954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer of Learning: What Does It Tell Us About Speech Production Units?
    Caudrelier T; Schwartz JL; Perrier P; Gerber S; Rochet-Capellan A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1613-1625. PubMed ID: 29931285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2003 Mar; 87(2):B69-77. PubMed ID: 12590043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual variability and exemplar strength in phonotactic learning.
    Denby T; Schecter J; Arn S; Dimov S; Goldrick M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):280-294. PubMed ID: 28933893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The adaptable speaker: A theory of implicit learning in language production.
    Dell GS; Kelley AC; Hwang S; Bian Y
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Apr; 128(3):446-487. PubMed ID: 33705201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing of syllables during handwriting: effects of graphomotor constraints.
    Sausset S; Lambert E; Olive T; Larocque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1872-9. PubMed ID: 22950838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
    Cholin J; Dell GS; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21244111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production.
    Dell GS; Reed KD; Adams DR; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1355-67. PubMed ID: 11185769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.
    Kittredge AK; Dell GS
    J Mem Lang; 2016 Aug; 89():8-22. PubMed ID: 27840556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.