These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26030713)
1. Comparison study of landfill gas emissions from subtropical landfill with various phases: A case study in Wuhan, China. Yang L; Chen Z; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xie Y J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Aug; 65(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 26030713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures. Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gas emission into the atmosphere from controlled landfills: an example from Legoli landfill (Tuscany, Italy). Raco B; Battaglini R; Lelli M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Jul; 17(6):1197-206. PubMed ID: 20180032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of rainfall on the diurnal variations of CH₄, CO₂, and N₂O fluxes from a municipal solid waste landfill. Zhang H; Yan X; Cai Z; Zhang Y Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 442():73-6. PubMed ID: 23178766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracer method to measure landfill gas emissions from leachate collection systems. Fredenslund AM; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2146-52. PubMed ID: 20378325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes. Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Viviani G Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2108-15. PubMed ID: 23465313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparision of two different ways of landfill gas utilization through greenhouse gas emission reductions analysis and financial analysis. Han H; Qian G; Long J; Li S Waste Manag Res; 2009 Nov; 27(9):922-7. PubMed ID: 19767323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methane emissions from landfills in Serbia and potential mitigation strategies: a case study. Stanisavljevic N; Ubavin D; Batinic B; Fellner J; Vujic G Waste Manag Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1095-103. PubMed ID: 22751946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of methane emissions from Palermo municipal landfill: Comparison between field measurements and models. Di Bella G; Di Trapani D; Viviani G Waste Manag; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1820-6. PubMed ID: 21482094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems? Spokas K; Bogner J; Chanton JP; Morcet M; Aran C; Graff C; Golvan YM; Hebe I Waste Manag; 2006; 26(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 16198554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of environmental factors and their effects on CH4 and CO2 emissions from a closed landfill: an ecological case study of Shanghai. Xiaoli C; Ziyang L; Shimaoka T; Nakayama H; Ying Z; Xiaoyan C; Komiya T; Ishizaki T; Youcai Z Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 19880303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geochemical and VOC-constraints on landfill gas age and attenuation characteristics: A case study from a waste disposal facility in Southern California. Hagedorn B; Kerfoot HB; Verwiel M; Matlock B Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():144-55. PubMed ID: 26601889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization and control of odorous gases at a landfill site: a case study in Hangzhou, China. Ying D; Chuanyu C; Bin H; Yueen X; Xuejuan Z; Yingxu C; Weixiang W Waste Manag; 2012 Feb; 32(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 22137772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mitigating methane emissions and air intrusion in heterogeneous landfills with a high permeability layer. Jung Y; Imhoff PT; Augenstein D; Yazdani R Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 20880688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design of top covers supporting aerobic in situ stabilization of old landfills--an experimental simulation in lysimeters. Hrad M; Huber-Humer M; Wimmer B; Reichenauer TG Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2324-35. PubMed ID: 22749719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of relative concentration of ethanol and other odorous compounds (OCs) emitted from the working surface at a landfill in China. Li D; Lu W; Liu Y; Guo H; Xu S; Ming Z; Wang H PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119305. PubMed ID: 25769100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines. Jeong S; Nam A; Yi SM; Kim JY Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():197-203. PubMed ID: 25488731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of methane and carbon dioxide surface emissions from a metropolitan landfill based on quasi-continuous eddy covariance measurement. Kang M; Cho S; Lee Y; Lee KH; Sohn S; Choi SW; Kim J; Park J Waste Manag; 2024 Sep; 186():355-365. PubMed ID: 38964055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile measurements of climate forcing agents: Application to methane emissions from landfill and natural gas compression. Jakober CA; Mara SL; Hsu YK; Herner JD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 25947210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate impact of an optimised gas treatment on old landfills. Berger R; Lehner J Waste Manag Res; 2022 Aug; 40(8):1189-1198. PubMed ID: 35000514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]