These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26030719)

  • 1. Evaluation of occupational health interventions using a randomized controlled trial: challenges and alternative research designs.
    Schelvis RM; Oude Hengel KM; Burdorf A; Blatter BM; Strijk JE; van der Beek AJ
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 Sep; 41(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 26030719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research Designs for Intervention Research with Small Samples II: Stepped Wedge and Interrupted Time-Series Designs.
    Fok CC; Henry D; Allen J
    Prev Sci; 2015 Oct; 16(7):967-77. PubMed ID: 26017633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of systems-oriented public health interventions: alternative research designs.
    Sanson-Fisher RW; D'Este CA; Carey ML; Noble N; Paul CL
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2014; 35():9-27. PubMed ID: 24387088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing alternative design options for chronic disease prevention interventions.
    Golfam M; Beall R; Brehaut J; Saeed S; Relton C; Ashbury FD; Little J
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2015 Jan; 45(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 25388015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternatives to Randomized Control Trial Designs for Community-Based Prevention Evaluation.
    Henry D; Tolan P; Gorman-Smith D; Schoeny M
    Prev Sci; 2017 Aug; 18(6):671-680. PubMed ID: 27600286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
    Stuart BL; Grebel LE; Butler CC; Hood K; Verheij TJM; Little P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Sep; 67(662):e643-e649. PubMed ID: 28760739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
    Johnston MV; Ottenbacher KJ; Reichardt CS
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 7576417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine-When observational studies are better than randomized controlled trials.
    Bosdriesz JR; Stel VS; van Diepen M; Meuleman Y; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Oct; 25(10):737-743. PubMed ID: 32542836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False Dichotomies and Health Policy Research Designs: Randomized Trials Are Not Always the Answer.
    Soumerai SB; Ceccarelli R; Koppel R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Feb; 32(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27757714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating an Organizational-Level Occupational Health Intervention in a Combined Regression Discontinuity and Randomized Control Design.
    Sørensen BO
    Stress Health; 2016 Oct; 32(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 27501080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence on the effectiveness of occupational health interventions.
    Ruotsalainen JH; Verbeek JH; Salmi JA; Jauhiainen M; Laamanen I; Pasternack I; Husman K
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Oct; 49(10):865-72. PubMed ID: 16869005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrupted time series design: a useful approach for studying interventions targeting participation.
    Anaby D; Lal S; Huszczynski J; Maich J; Rogers J; Law M
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 34(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 24328671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research.
    Hawkins NG; Sanson-Fisher RW; Shakeshaft A; D'Este C; Green LW
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Aug; 33(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 17673105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study designs and systematic reviews of interventions: building evidence across study designs.
    Sargeant JM; Kelton DF; O'Connor AM
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():10-7. PubMed ID: 24905992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up.
    Twisk J; Proper K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Mar; 57(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 15066681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research.
    Miller CJ; Smith SN; Pugatch M
    Psychiatry Res; 2020 Jan; 283():112452. PubMed ID: 31255320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.
    Berger ML; Dreyer N; Anderson F; Towse A; Sedrakyan A; Normand SL
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 22433752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designs of Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods in Field Settings.
    Wong VC; Steiner PM
    Eval Rev; 2018 Apr; 42(2):176-213. PubMed ID: 29954223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.