These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26030795)

  • 1. Application of the fractional-stable distributions for approximation of the gene expression profiles.
    Saenko V; Saenko Y
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 26030795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A probabilistic framework for microarray data analysis: fundamental probability models and statistical inference.
    Ogunnaike BA; Gelmi CA; Edwards JS
    J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 20170665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of distribution algorithms with Kikuchi approximations.
    Santana R
    Evol Comput; 2005; 13(1):67-97. PubMed ID: 15901427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating expression levels of different genes as a sample in microarray data analysis: is it worth a risk?
    Klebanov L; Yakovlev A
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article9. PubMed ID: 16646873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmentation and intensity estimation of microarray images using a gamma-t mixture model.
    Baek J; Son YS; McLachlan GJ
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameter-free testing of the shape of a probability distribution.
    Broom M; Nouvellet P; Bacon JP; Waxman D
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):509-15. PubMed ID: 17293028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcriptome network component analysis with limited microarray data.
    Galbraith SJ; Tran LM; Liao JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1886-94. PubMed ID: 16766556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the particular case of circuits with geometrically distributed components for approximation of fractional order models: Application to a new class of model for power law type long memory behaviour modelling.
    Sabatier J
    J Adv Res; 2020 Sep; 25():243-255. PubMed ID: 32922991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extreme-value distributions and renormalization group.
    Calvo I; Cuchí JC; Esteve JG; Falceto F
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):041109. PubMed ID: 23214531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power-law correlated processes with asymmetric distributions.
    Podobnik B; Ivanov PCh; Jazbinsek V; Trontelj Z; Stanley HE; Grosse I
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Feb; 71(2 Pt 2):025104. PubMed ID: 15783366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the complexity of the Lévy-walk nature of human mobility with a multi-scale cost∕benefit model.
    Scafetta N
    Chaos; 2011 Dec; 21(4):043106. PubMed ID: 22225343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. maSigPro: a method to identify significantly differential expression profiles in time-course microarray experiments.
    Conesa A; Nueda MJ; Ferrer A; Talón M
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1096-102. PubMed ID: 16481333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional Edgeworth expansion: Corrections to the Gaussian-Lévy central-limit theorem.
    Hazut N; Medalion S; Kessler DA; Barkai E
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 May; 91(5):052124. PubMed ID: 26066136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple returns for some regular and mixing maps.
    Haydn N; Lunedei E; Rossi L; Turchetti G; Vaienti S
    Chaos; 2005 Sep; 15(3):33109. PubMed ID: 16252983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles.
    Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Ben-Tovim Jones L; Ng SW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16675467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fertility heterogeneity as a mechanism for power law distributions of recurrence times.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Feb; 87(2):022815. PubMed ID: 23496576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An order estimation based approach to identify response genes for microarray time course data.
    Lu ZK; Allen OB; Desmond AF
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Dec; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 23241685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential kernel density approximation and its application to real-time visual tracking.
    Han B; Comaniciu D; Zhu Y; Davis LS
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Jul; 30(7):1186-97. PubMed ID: 18550902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.