148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2603130)
1. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
Hedin M
Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Densitometric evaluation of three intra-oral radiographic films.
Seeliger JE; Prinsloo JJ
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 May; 44(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 2635441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
Geist JR; Gleason MJ
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
Swart TJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
Bai J; Chen H
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
Geist JR; Brand JW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
