These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

818 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26032297)

  • 1. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Premenstrual syndrome as a criminal defense.
    Lewis JW
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Oct; 19(5):425-41. PubMed ID: 2260910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remodelling criminal insanity: Exploring philosophical, legal, and medical premises of the medical model used in Norwegian law.
    Gröning L; Haukvik UK; Morse SJ; Radovic S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101776. PubMed ID: 35101774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
    Burrows M; Reid WH
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
    Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epileptic automatisms in the criminal courts: 13 cases tried in England and Wales between 1975 and 2001.
    Reuber M; Mackay RD
    Epilepsia; 2008 Jan; 49(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 17727668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mental disability requirement in the insanity defense.
    Slovenko R
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 10398328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment on the criminal responsibility of drug-induced mental disorders: a questionnaire survey].
    Zhang SY; Zhao H; Tang T; Guan W
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 30(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 25816573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Feix J; Wolber G
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17592162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arizona's Insanity Defense,
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):618-622. PubMed ID: 34479941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The irresponsible criminal in Norwegian medico-legal discourse.
    Skålevåg SA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 24145064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?
    Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychopathic disorders and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 260 Suppl 2():S137-41. PubMed ID: 20936297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research findings on Greek forensic patients found not guilty by reason of insanity. A juxtaposition of patients who committed a criminal offense during their first psychotic episode with those who did so later in the course of their illness.
    Markopoulou M; Karakasi V; Garyfallos G; Pavlidis P; Douzenis A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101673. PubMed ID: 33517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
    Krauss DA; Gongola J; Scurich N; Busch B
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 29691882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.