These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict. Patten MM; Haig D Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 19435832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness. Zajitschek F; Connallon T Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual conflict and the maintenance of genetic variation in natural populations. Meisel RP Mol Ecol; 2018 Sep; 27(18):3569-3571. PubMed ID: 30218590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High expression of Cyp6g1, a cytochrome P450 gene, does not necessarily confer DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Kuruganti S; Lam V; Zhou X; Bennett G; Pittendrigh BR; Ganguly R Gene; 2007 Feb; 388(1-2):43-53. PubMed ID: 17134855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insights into DDT Resistance from the Schmidt JM; Battlay P; Gledhill-Smith RS; Good RT; Lumb C; Fournier-Level A; Robin C Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1181-1193. PubMed ID: 28935691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium. Patten MM; Haig D; Ubeda F Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3638-42. PubMed ID: 20722728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila. Rusuwa BB; Chung H; Allen SL; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF Curr Biol; 2022 Jul; 32(14):3161-3169.e7. PubMed ID: 35700732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Gibson JR; Chippindale AK; Rice WR Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 269(1490):499-505. PubMed ID: 11886642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture. Patten MM; Ubeda F; Haig D Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Nov; 280(1770):20131795. PubMed ID: 24026821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Mullon C; Pomiankowski A; Reuter M Evolution; 2012 Dec; 66(12):3743-53. PubMed ID: 23206133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual Antagonism, Temporally Fluctuating Selection, and Variable Dominance Affect a Regulatory Polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Glaser-Schmitt A; Wittmann MJ; Ramnarine TJS; Parsch J Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Oct; 38(11):4891-4907. PubMed ID: 34289067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]