These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26032845)

  • 1. Sexual conflict maintains variation at an insecticide resistance locus.
    Rostant WG; Kay C; Wedell N; Hosken DJ
    BMC Biol; 2015 Jun; 13():34. PubMed ID: 26032845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DDT resistance, epistasis and male fitness in flies.
    Smith DT; Hosken DJ; Rostant WG; Yeo M; Griffin RM; Bretman A; Price TA; Ffrench-Constant RH; Wedell N
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):1351-62. PubMed ID: 21507117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-specific recombination rates and allele frequencies affect the invasion of sexually antagonistic variation on autosomes.
    Wyman MJ; Wyman MC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 26(11):2428-37. PubMed ID: 24070143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pleiotropic Effects of DDT Resistance on Male Size and Behaviour.
    Rostant WG; Bowyer J; Coupland J; Facey J; Hosken DJ; Wedell N
    Behav Genet; 2017 Jul; 47(4):449-458. PubMed ID: 28466236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intralocus sexual conflict and insecticide resistance.
    Hawkes MF; Gamble CE; Turner EC; Carey MR; Wedell N; Hosken DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1843):. PubMed ID: 27881743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.
    Patten MM; Haig D
    Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 19435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus.
    Mokkonen M; Kokko H; Koskela E; Lehtonen J; Mappes T; Martiskainen H; Mills SC
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6058):972-4. PubMed ID: 22096197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual conflict and the maintenance of genetic variation in natural populations.
    Meisel RP
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Sep; 27(18):3569-3571. PubMed ID: 30218590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High expression of Cyp6g1, a cytochrome P450 gene, does not necessarily confer DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kuruganti S; Lam V; Zhou X; Bennett G; Pittendrigh BR; Ganguly R
    Gene; 2007 Feb; 388(1-2):43-53. PubMed ID: 17134855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insights into DDT Resistance from the
    Schmidt JM; Battlay P; Gledhill-Smith RS; Good RT; Lumb C; Fournier-Level A; Robin C
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1181-1193. PubMed ID: 28935691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium.
    Patten MM; Haig D; Ubeda F
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3638-42. PubMed ID: 20722728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
    Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila.
    Rusuwa BB; Chung H; Allen SL; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    Curr Biol; 2022 Jul; 32(14):3161-3169.e7. PubMed ID: 35700732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.
    Gibson JR; Chippindale AK; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 269(1490):499-505. PubMed ID: 11886642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.
    Patten MM; Ubeda F; Haig D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Nov; 280(1770):20131795. PubMed ID: 24026821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles.
    Mullon C; Pomiankowski A; Reuter M
    Evolution; 2012 Dec; 66(12):3743-53. PubMed ID: 23206133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual Antagonism, Temporally Fluctuating Selection, and Variable Dominance Affect a Regulatory Polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Glaser-Schmitt A; Wittmann MJ; Ramnarine TJS; Parsch J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Oct; 38(11):4891-4907. PubMed ID: 34289067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.