BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1091 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26032933)

  • 1. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
    Hao H
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
    Hao H; Zhang K
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Provision of Paid Web-Based Medical Consultation in China: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data From a Medical Consultation Website.
    Li Y; Yan X; Song X
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jun; 21(6):e12126. PubMed ID: 31162129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.
    Hao H; Zhang K; Wang W; Gao G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():37-44. PubMed ID: 28118920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective.
    Ren D; Ma B
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e21892. PubMed ID: 33709940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.
    Zhang W; Deng Z; Hong Z; Evans R; Ma J; Zhang H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e35. PubMed ID: 29371176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures.
    Kanouse DE; Schlesinger M; Shaller D; Martino SC; Rybowski L
    Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 26551765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.
    Wang JN; Chiu YL; Yu H; Hsu YT
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e427. PubMed ID: 29269344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
    Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality of health care in Germany. A six-country comparison].
    Sawicki PT
    Med Klin (Munich); 2005 Nov; 100(11):755-68. PubMed ID: 16328186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
    Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the Role of Online Health Community Information in Patients' Decisions to Switch from Online to Offline Medical Services.
    Li Y; Song Y; Zhao W; Guo X; Ju X; Vogel D
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103951. PubMed ID: 31473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-Physician Interaction and Trust in Online Health Community: The Role of Perceived Usefulness of Health Information and Services.
    Peng Y; Yin P; Deng Z; Wang R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data Mining of the Reviews from Online Private Doctors.
    Liu J; Zhang W; Jiang X; Zhou Y
    Telemed J E Health; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 31674890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice.
    McManus IC; Gordon D; Winder BC
    Qual Health Care; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 10848365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What defines a good website of a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology? A user survey.
    Rezniczek GA; Hilal Z; Helal A; Schiermeier S; Tempfer CB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 30656441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary care specialty choices of United States medical graduates, 1997-2006.
    Jeffe DB; Whelan AJ; Andriole DA
    Acad Med; 2010 Jun; 85(6):947-58. PubMed ID: 20505392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of interactive factors on online health consultation review deviation: An empirical investigation.
    He Y; Guo X; Wu T; Vogel D
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Jul; 163():104781. PubMed ID: 35512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.