These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26032950)

  • 1. Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised controlled trials.
    Carlisle JB; Dexter F; Pandit JJ; Shafer SL; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):848-58. PubMed ID: 26032950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for non-random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh.
    Carlisle JB; Loadsman JA
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 27988952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directional baseline differences and type I error probabilities in randomized clinical trials.
    Overall JE; Magee KN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 1300213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):521-537. PubMed ID: 22404311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18806256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability binning comparison: a metric for quantitating univariate distribution differences.
    Roederer M; Treister A; Moore W; Herzenberg LA
    Cytometry; 2001 Sep; 45(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11598945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative estimation of sampling uncertainties for mycotoxins in cereal shipments.
    Bourgeois FS; Lyman GJ
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2012; 29(7):1141-56. PubMed ID: 22651820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chance-level hit rates in closed-set, forced-choice audiometry and a novel utility for the significance test-based detection of malingering.
    Steffens T; Steffens LM; Marcrum SC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231715. PubMed ID: 32315326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability binning comparison: a metric for quantitating multivariate distribution differences.
    Roederer M; Moore W; Treister A; Hardy RR; Herzenberg LA
    Cytometry; 2001 Sep; 45(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 11598946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential treatment allocation procedures in clinical trials--with particular attention to the analysis of results for the biased coin design.
    Halpern J; Brown BW
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(3):211-29. PubMed ID: 3738289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for calculating forces within quantum Monte Carlo simulations.
    Badinski A; Haynes PD; Trail JR; Needs RJ
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 Feb; 22(7):074202. PubMed ID: 21386380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo methods in clinical research: applications in multivariable analysis.
    Concato J; Feinstein AR
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 9291696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women' health.
    Bordewijk EM; Wang R; Askie LM; Gurrin LC; Thornton JG; van Wely M; Li W; Mol BW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():72-83. PubMed ID: 32381348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trials and p-values, beware of the extremes.
    Cleophas TJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Mar; 42(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 15080563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comment on the importance of numerical evaluation of analytic solutions involving approximations.
    Overall JE; Starbuck RR; Doyle SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 7951276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins.
    Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Jan; 235(3):983-1002. PubMed ID: 8289329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.