These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26033985)

  • 1. Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; Katsanos S; van der Kley F; Regeer M; Al Amri I; Sianos G; Marsan NA; Delgado V; Bax JJ
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Aug; 36(31):2087-2096. PubMed ID: 26033985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TAVR outcome after reclassification of aortic valve stenosis by using a hybrid continuity equation that combines computed tomography and echocardiography data.
    Weber M; Jaenisch M; Spilker M; Pingel S; Schueler R; Stundl A; Sedaghat A; Hammerstingl C; Mellert F; Grube E; Nickenig G; Werner N; Sinning JM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 96(4):958-967. PubMed ID: 32190961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodality imaging derived energy loss index and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Holy EW; Nguyen-Kim TDL; Hoffelner L; Stocker D; Stadler T; Stähli BE; Kebernik J; Maisano F; Kasel MA; Frauenfelder T; Ruschitzka F; Nietlispach F; Tanner FC
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32533142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of aortic stenosis severity reclassification using an imaging data fusion method in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Stokłosa P; Michałowska I; Duchnowski P; Ryś M; Żebrowska A; Orłowska-Baranowska E; Hryniewiecki T; Szymański P
    Kardiol Pol; 2018; 76(12):1725-1732. PubMed ID: 30211435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical significance of energy loss index in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.
    Altes A; Ringle A; Bohbot Y; Bouchot O; Appert L; Guerbaai RA; Gun M; Ennezat PV; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 21(6):608-615. PubMed ID: 32031603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reclassification of aortic stenosis by fusion of echocardiography and computed tomography in low-gradient aortic stenosis.
    El Faquir N; Vollema ME; Delgado V; Ren B; Spitzer E; Rasheed M; Rahhab Z; Geleijnse ML; Budde RPJ; de Jaegere PP; Bax JJ; Van Mieghem NM
    Neth Heart J; 2022 Apr; 30(4):212-226. PubMed ID: 33052577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.
    Liu S; Churchill J; Hua L; Zeng X; Rhoades V; Namasivayam M; Baliyan V; Ghoshhajra BB; Dong T; Dal-Bianco JP; Passeri JJ; Levine RA; Hung J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Apr; 33(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 32248906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Paradoxical Low Flow, Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Abudiab MM; Pandit A; Chaliki HP
    Korean Circ J; 2017 Jan; 47(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28154595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confirmation of Aortic Stenosis Severity in Case of Discordance Between Aortic Valve Area and Gradient.
    Silva I; Salaun E; Côté N; Pibarot P
    JACC Case Rep; 2022 Feb; 4(3):170-177. PubMed ID: 35199011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B; Schoenhagen P; Kapadia SR; Svensson LG; Rodriguez L; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.
    Hachicha Z; Dumesnil JG; Bogaty P; Pibarot P
    Circulation; 2007 Jun; 115(22):2856-64. PubMed ID: 17533183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heart failure in severe aortic valve stenosis: prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and mean gradient on outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Gotzmann M; Rahlmann P; Hehnen T; Müller P; Lindstaedt M; Mügge A; Ewers A
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 22782969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Clavel MA; Dumesnil JG; Capoulade R; Mathieu P; Sénéchal M; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(14):1259-67. PubMed ID: 22657269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve area using computed tomography-derived correction factor to improve the validity of left ventricular outflow tract measurements.
    Alskaf E; Gupta T; Kardos A
    Echocardiography; 2020 Feb; 37(2):196-206. PubMed ID: 32003912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of patients with low-gradient "severe" aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.
    Jander N; Minners J; Holme I; Gerdts E; Boman K; Brudi P; Chambers JB; Egstrup K; Kesäniemi YA; Malbecq W; Nienaber CA; Ray S; Rossebø A; Pedersen TR; Skjærpe T; Willenheimer R; Wachtell K; Neumann FJ; Gohlke-Bärwolf C
    Circulation; 2011 Mar; 123(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 21321152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic valve replacement in true severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and low ejection fraction.
    Ozsöyler I; Lafci B; Emrecan B; Kestelli M; Bozok S; Ozbek C; Yesil M; Gürbüz A
    Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(4):E681-5. PubMed ID: 16757422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invasive measures of afterload in low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.
    Eleid MF; Nishimura RA; Borlaug BA; Sorajja P
    Circ Heart Fail; 2013 Jul; 6(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 23709656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study.
    Mohty D; Magne J; Deltreuil M; Aboyans V; Echahidi N; Cassat C; Pibarot P; Laskar M; Virot P
    Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(11 Suppl 1):S235-42. PubMed ID: 24030412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.