These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26034562)

  • 21. Evaluation of stereoscopic picture quality with CFF.
    Mitsuhashi T
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 8974885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental investigation of the effect of binocular disparity on the visibility threshold of asymmetric noise in stereoscopic viewing.
    Kim HG; Lee SI; Man Ro Y
    Opt Express; 2016 Aug; 24(17):19607-15. PubMed ID: 27557239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of crosstalk in stereoscopic display devices.
    Zafar F; Badano A
    J Soc Inf Disp; 2014 Dec; 22(12):613-622. PubMed ID: 29755254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in ocular parameters depending on the motion-in-depth of a three-dimensional display.
    Yum HR; Park SH; Kang HB; Shin SY
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 99(12):1706-12. PubMed ID: 26024674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual fatigue and discomfort after stereoscopic display viewing.
    Zhang L; Zhang YQ; Zhang JS; Xu L; Jonas JB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):e149-53. PubMed ID: 23164154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual Discomfort with Stereo 3D Displays when the Head is Not Upright.
    Kane D; Held RT; Banks MS
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012 Feb; 8288():828814. PubMed ID: 24058723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual Discomfort and the Temporal Properties of the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict.
    Kim J; Kane D; Banks MS
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012 Feb; 8288():828811. PubMed ID: 24027615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EEG based evaluation of stereoscopic 3D displays for viewer discomfort.
    Malik AS; Khairuddin RN; Amin HU; Smith ML; Kamel N; Abdullah JM; Fawzy SM; Shim S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():21. PubMed ID: 25886584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Heterophoria adaptation during the viewing of 3D stereoscopic stimuli.
    Karpicka E; Howarth PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 23859603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stereoscopic depth increases intersubject correlations of brain networks.
    Gaebler M; Biessmann F; Lamke JP; Müller KR; Walter H; Hetzer S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():427-34. PubMed ID: 24945664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A survey of visually induced symptoms and associated factors in spectators of three dimensional stereoscopic movies.
    Solimini AG; Mannocci A; Di Thiene D; La Torre G
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():779. PubMed ID: 22974235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Viewing 3D TV over two months produces no discernible effects on balance, coordination or eyesight.
    Read JC; Godfrey A; Bohr I; Simonotto J; Galna B; Smulders TV
    Ergonomics; 2016 Aug; 59(8):1073-88. PubMed ID: 26758965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.
    Love GD; Hoffman DM; Hands PJ; Gao J; Kirby AK; Banks MS
    Opt Express; 2009 Aug; 17(18):15716-25. PubMed ID: 19724571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D visual discomfort predictor: analysis of horizontal disparity and neural activity statistics.
    Park J; Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Mar; 24(3):1101-14. PubMed ID: 25532185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are there side effects to watching 3D movies? A prospective crossover observational study on visually induced motion sickness.
    Solimini AG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56160. PubMed ID: 23418530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EEG based time and frequency dynamics analysis of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS).
    Arsalan Naqvi SA; Badruddin N; Jatoi MA; Malik AS; Hazabbah W; Abdullah B
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):721-9. PubMed ID: 26462677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Viewing experience of 3DTV: An exploration of the feeling of sickness and presence in a shopping mall.
    Obrist M; Wurhofer D; Meneweger T; Grill T; Tscheligi M
    Entertain Comput; 2013 Feb; 4(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 23482894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The stereoscopic advantage for vection persists despite reversed disparity.
    Palmisano S; Nakamura S; Allison RS; Riecke BE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2098-2118. PubMed ID: 31900859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic visual responses of accommodation and vergence to electro-holographic images.
    Nozaki A; Mitobe M; Okuyama F; Sakamoto Y
    Opt Express; 2017 Feb; 25(4):4542-4551. PubMed ID: 28241657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stereoscopic 3D entertainment and its effect on viewing comfort: comparison of children and adults.
    Pölönen M; Järvenpää T; Bilcu B
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 22818394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.