These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26034567)

  • 21. Focus cues affect perceived depth.
    Watt SJ; Akeley K; Ernst MO; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2005 Dec; 5(10):834-62. PubMed ID: 16441189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length.
    Howe CQ; Purves D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(20):13184-8. PubMed ID: 12237401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Viewing Patterns and Perspectival Paintings: An Eye-Tracking Study on the Effect of the Vanishing Point.
    Crucq A
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 34676059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations.
    Braunstein ML; Liter JC; Tittle JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Jun; 19(3):598-614. PubMed ID: 8331315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?
    Li Z; Durgin FH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1609-1618. PubMed ID: 29856003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing distances in mental images constructed from visual experience or verbal descriptions: the impact of survey versus route perspective.
    Péruch P; Chabanne V; Nesa MP; Thinus-Blanc C; Denis M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1950-67. PubMed ID: 16987783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Large continuous perspective change with noncoplanar points enables accurate slant perception.
    Wang XM; Lind M; Bingham GP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1508-1522. PubMed ID: 29927269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Non-metric distance judgements are influenced by image projection geometry and field of view.
    Ruta N; Ganczarek J; Pietras K; Burleigh A; Pepperell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; 76(12):2837-2853. PubMed ID: 36905339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from optical expansions and contractions.
    Gogel WC; Eby DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):783-806. PubMed ID: 9259645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images.
    Todorović D
    Perception; 2005; 34(5):521-44. PubMed ID: 15991690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of size, clutter, and complexity on vanishing-point distances in visual imagery.
    Hubbard TL; Baird JC
    Psychol Res; 1993; 55(3):223-36. PubMed ID: 8416041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceived structure from optic flow: consistent versus variable mapping of 3-D Euclidean structure.
    Lind M; Börjesson E
    Scand J Psychol; 2001 Apr; 42(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 11321633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1.
    Trotter Y; Celebrini S; Stricanne B; Thorpe S; Imbert M
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 76(5):2872-85. PubMed ID: 8930240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aging and the visual perception of exocentric distance.
    Norman JF; Adkins OC; Norman HF; Cox AG; Rogers CE
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):52-8. PubMed ID: 25720533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space.
    Foley JM; Ribeiro-Filho NP; Da Silva JA
    Vision Res; 2004 Jan; 44(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 14637364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vertical disparity affects shape and size judgments across surfaces separated in depth.
    O'Kane LM; Hibbard PB
    Perception; 2007; 36(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 17624116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship between retinal distance and object field angles for finite schematic eyes.
    Suheimat M; Zhu HF; Lambert A; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 27199003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.