These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26034870)

  • 1. Judicial bypass of parental consent for abortion: characteristics of pregnant minor "Jane Doe's".
    Friedman SH; Hendrix T; Haberman J; Jain A
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2015 Jun; 203(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 26034870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 180():1022-33. PubMed ID: 16477716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisting minors seeking abortions in judicial bypass proceedings: a guardian ad litem is no substitute for an attorney.
    Graybill ES
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 55(2):581-606. PubMed ID: 14986670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons for and Logistical Burdens of Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Illinois.
    Ralph LJ; Chaiten L; Werth E; Daniel S; Brindis CD; Biggs MA
    J Adolesc Health; 2021 Jan; 68(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33041202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planned Parenthood of Idaho v. Wasden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 376():908-44. PubMed ID: 17225343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Act of 27 September 1987.
    United States. California
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():339-402. PubMed ID: 12346694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions.
    Henshaw SK; Kost K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):196-207, 213. PubMed ID: 1426181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parental consent for abortion and the judicial bypass option in Arkansas: effects and correlates.
    Joyce T
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2010 Sep; 42(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 20887286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court upholds parental notice requirements.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 2226749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.
    Janiak E; Fulcher IR; Cottrill AA; Tantoco N; Mason AH; Fortin J; Sabino J; Goldberg AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 133(5):978-986. PubMed ID: 30969206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental notice and consent for abortion: out of step with family law principles and policies.
    Greenberger MD; Connor K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2029941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.
    Altindag O; Joyce T
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Aug; 107(8):1266-1271. PubMed ID: 28640684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.