These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26035469)

  • 21. The network meta-analytic-predictive approach to non-inferiority trials.
    Schmidli H; Wandel S; Neuenschwander B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Apr; 22(2):219-40. PubMed ID: 22218367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An introduction to a Bayesian method for meta-analysis: The confidence profile method.
    Eddy DM; Hasselblad V; Shachter R
    Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2182960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian inference for randomized clinical trials with treatment failures.
    Shaffer ML; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1215-28. PubMed ID: 15083479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Oct; 34(7):911-8. PubMed ID: 25260872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Debray TP; Samara M; Belger M; Siontis GC; Leucht S; Salanti G;
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 28083901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening.
    Prevost TC; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3359-76. PubMed ID: 11122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mixture model using likelihood-based and Bayesian approaches for identifying responders and non-responders in longitudinal clinical trials.
    He J; Entsuah R
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):327-36. PubMed ID: 25182571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    O'Rourke K; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2733-42; author reply 2743. PubMed ID: 16118810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treating blunt aortic injuries with endografts: pros and cons of a meta-analysis.
    Starnes BW
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 23(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 20826295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian evidence synthesis for exploring generalizability of treatment effects: a case study of combining randomized and non-randomized results in diabetes.
    Verde PE; Ohmann C; Morbach S; Icks A
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(10):1654-75. PubMed ID: 26593632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.
    Zhang J; Ko CW; Nie L; Chen Y; Tiwari R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1293-1310. PubMed ID: 29433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Bayesian bias-adjusted random-effects model for synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions.
    Yao M; Mei F; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
    J Evid Based Med; 2024 Sep; 17(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 39107946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.