These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26035471)

  • 21. Forest plots: data summaries at a glance.
    Yeh J; D'Amico F
    J Fam Pract; 2004 Dec; 53(12):1007. PubMed ID: 15581449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alternative Ways to Quantify Sustained Remission: Applying the Continuity Rewarded Score and Patient Vector Graph.
    Jurgens MS; Jacobs JW; Boers M; van der Goes MC; van der Veen MJ; Lafeber FP; Bijlsma JW;
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2015 Oct; 67(10):1471-4. PubMed ID: 25708452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots.
    Ioannidis JP; Patsopoulos NA; Rothstein HR
    BMJ; 2008 Jun; 336(7658):1413-5. PubMed ID: 18566080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
    Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
    Malloy MJ; Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1842-64. PubMed ID: 23097338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forest Plot Viewer: a new graphing tool.
    Boyles AL; Harris SF; Rooney AA; Thayer KA
    Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):746-7. PubMed ID: 21811115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radar plots: a useful way for presenting multivariate health care data.
    Saary MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 18313553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inference by eye: reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals.
    Cumming G
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 18991332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis: current issues in research synthesis.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1253-7; discussion 1259-62. PubMed ID: 8817799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():129. PubMed ID: 25495636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Novel presentational approaches were developed for reporting network meta-analysis.
    Tan SH; Cooper NJ; Bujkiewicz S; Welton NJ; Caldwell DM; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):672-80. PubMed ID: 24560089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 'Cross hairs' plots for diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Phillips B; Stewart LA; Sutton AJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Jul; 1(3-4):308-15. PubMed ID: 26061474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clustered disturbances lead to bias in large-scale estimates based on forest sample plots.
    Fisher JI; Hurtt GC; Thomas RQ; Chambers JQ
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Jun; 11(6):554-63. PubMed ID: 18373680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpreting forest plots and funnel plots in meta-analysis.
    Raina SK
    Neurol India; 2016; 64(4):840. PubMed ID: 27381156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis.
    Baker R; Jackson D
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2008 Jun; 11(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18581818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.