278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26035518)
1. Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.
Elhanafi S; Ortiz AM; Yarlagadda A; Tsai C; Eloliby M; Mallawaarachchi I; Dwivedi A; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 49(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 26035518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.
Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can polyp detection rate be used prospectively as a marker of adenoma detection rate?
Murchie B; Tandon K; Zackria S; Wexner SD; O'Rourke C; Castro FJ
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 28812147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate at endoscopy in a non-screening population.
Murphy B; Myers E; O'Shea T; Feeley K; Waldron B
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2295. PubMed ID: 32041974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.
Francis DL; Rodriguez-Correa DT; Buchner A; Harewood GC; Wallace M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):493-7. PubMed ID: 21353846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis.
Niv Y
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 30(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 29293111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate.
Jrebi NY; Hefty M; Jalouta T; Ogilvie J; Davis AT; Asgeirsson T; Luchtefeld M
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27287897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde inspection
Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of successive endoscopic procedures in polyp and adenoma detection rates: Too early is not always too good.
Olivera P; Cernadas G; Fanjul I; Peralta D; Zubiaurre I; Lasa J; Moore R
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2020 Oct; 39(5):450-456. PubMed ID: 33150568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
