These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26035518)

  • 41. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of sedation type on adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy.
    Tarhini H; Alrazim A; Ghusn W; Hosni M; Kerbage A; Soweid A; Sharara AI; Mourad F; Francis F; Shaib Y; Barada K; Daniel F
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022; 46(7):101981. PubMed ID: 35728761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.
    Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L; Lu K; Ovenden A; Rana K; Singh G; Krishnamurthi S; Edwards S; Wilson B; Nakamura M; Yamamura T; Ruszkiewicz A; Hirooka Y; Burt AD; Singh R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30552716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
    Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy.
    Kashiwagi K; Inoue N; Yoshida T; Bessyo R; Yoneno K; Imaeda H; Ogata H; Kanai T; Sugino Y; Iwao Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174155. PubMed ID: 28328936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Shan K; Lu H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Xu L; Wang W; Hu C; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 33971824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Effect of Intervention for Improving Colonoscopy Quality Is Associated with the Personality Traits of Endoscopists.
    Choi HH; Sung SY; Lee BI; Cho H; Jung Y; Park JM; Cho YS; Lee KM; Kim SW; Choi H; Chae HS; Choi MG
    Gut Liver; 2024 Mar; 18(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 37158042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates.
    Taber A; Romagnuolo J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):782-6. PubMed ID: 20363418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An Adjusted Level of Adenoma Detection Rate is Necessary for Adults Below 50 Years Old.
    Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin JE; Kim KO; Yang HJ; Kim HG; Cho YS; Boo SJ; Lee J; Jung Y; Lee HJ; Koo HS; Joo YE;
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 52(8):703-708. PubMed ID: 28787362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
    Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of Linked Color Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Adenoma Requiring Endoscopic Treatment: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tanaka S; Omori J; Hoshimoto A; Nishimoto T; Akimoto N; Tatsuguchi A; Fujimori S; Iwakiri K
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2023; 90(1):111-120. PubMed ID: 36908124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients.
    Zessner-Spitzenberg J; Waldmann E; Jiricka L; Rockenbauer LM; Hinterberger A; Cook J; Asaturi A; Szymanska A; Majcher B; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2023 May; 55(5):434-441. PubMed ID: 36482285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.