These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26036421)

  • 1. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying stimuli that cue multiple responses triggers the congruency sequence effect independent of response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Colter KM; Grant LD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):677-689. PubMed ID: 28095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The congruency sequence effect emerges when the distracter precedes the target.
    Weissman DH; Egner T; Hawks Z; Link J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():8-21. PubMed ID: 25616120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
    Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Willmes K; Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 26813694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task.
    Chen J; Li C; He C; Chen A
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Oct; 52(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 19911137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-out for conflict monitoring theory: Preventing rhythmic biases eliminates the list-level proportion congruent effect.
    Schmidt JR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 27977230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH; Hawks ZW; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):566-83. PubMed ID: 26389630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.
    Strobach T; Wendt M; Tomat M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103036. PubMed ID: 32086004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load is not always a crucial determinant of early versus late selection.
    Weissman DH; Drake B; Colella K; Samuel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():125-135. PubMed ID: 29454940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Sprengel M; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 30083838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.