These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26036856)
1. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project. Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Diaz GA; Zinberg RE; Ferryman K; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26036856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M; Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project. Suckiel SA; Linderman MD; Sanderson SC; Diaz GA; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE; Zinberg RE J Genet Couns; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1044-53. PubMed ID: 26898680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project. Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Zinberg R; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Diaz GA; Schadt EE Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(3):280-292. PubMed ID: 28051073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project. Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies. Niemiec E; Borry P; Pinxten W; Howard HC Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 27647801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Joseph G; Chen F; Harris-Wai J; Puck JM; Young C; Koenig BA Pediatrics; 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. PubMed ID: 26729702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing. Robinson JO; Carroll TM; Feuerman LZ; Perry DL; Hoffman-Andrews L; Walsh RC; Christensen KD; Green RC; McGuire AL; J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 26928896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing. Jamal L; Robinson JO; Christensen KD; Blumenthal-Barby J; Slashinski MJ; Perry DL; Vassy JL; Wycliff J; Green RC; McGuire AL AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 28949844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting results from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing in clinical practice: a proposal for Canada? Zawati MH; Parry D; Thorogood A; Nguyen MT; Boycott KM; Rosenblatt D; Knoppers BM J Med Genet; 2014 Jan; 51(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 24078715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. Tabor HK; Stock J; Brazg T; McMillin MJ; Dent KM; Yu JH; Shendure J; Bamshad MJ Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Jun; 158A(6):1310-9. PubMed ID: 22532433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent. Knoppers BM EMBO Rep; 2010 Jun; 11(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 20448662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes towards Personal Genomics and Sharing of Genetic Data among Older Swiss Adults: A Qualitative Study. Mählmann L; Schee Gen Halfmann S; von Wyl A; Brand A Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(5):293-306. PubMed ID: 29414817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research. Tabor HK; Berkman BE; Hull SC; Bamshad MJ Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Dec; 155A(12):2916-24. PubMed ID: 22038764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project. Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Diaz GA; Zinberg RE; Ferryman K; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):153. PubMed ID: 26508568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Oliver JM; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Kelly PA; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 22213783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Exome and Genome Sequencing Technologies for the Complete Capture of Protein-Coding Regions. Lelieveld SH; Spielmann M; Mundlos S; Veltman JA; Gilissen C Hum Mutat; 2015 Aug; 36(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 25973577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences. Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research. Oberg JA; Glade Bender JL; Cohn EG; Morris M; Ruiz J; Chung WK; Appelbaum PS; Kung AL; Levine JM Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1374-80. PubMed ID: 25832998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]